Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29777323›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2018

Andriod Device-Based Cervical Cancer Screening for Resource-Poor Settings.

Vidya Kudva, Keerthana Prasad, Shyamala Guruvare

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Deep dive into deep learning methods for cervical cancer detection and classification.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Artificial intelligence and visual inspection in cervical cancer screening.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vidya KudvaSchool of Information Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India.
Keerthana PrasadSchool of Information Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India. keerthana.prasad@manipal.edu.
Shyamala GuruvareDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India.
Kasturba Medical College, Manipal · INManipal Academy of Higher Education · INNitte University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) is an effective, affordable and simple test for cervical cancer screening in resource-poor settings. But considerable expertise is needed to differentiate cancerous lesions from normal lesions, which is lacking in developing countries. Many studies have attempted automation of cervical cancer detection from cervix images acquired during the VIA process. These studies used images acquired through colposcopy or cervicography. However, colposcopy is expensive and hence is not feasible as a screening tool in resource-poor settings. Cervicography uses a digital camera to acquire cervix images which are subsequently sent to experts for evaluation. Hence, cervicography does not provide a real-time decision of whether the cervix is normal or not, during the VIA examination. In case the cervix is found to be abnormal, the patient may be referred to a hospital for further evaluation using Pap smear and/or biopsy. An android device with an inbuilt app to acquire images and provide instant results would be an obvious choice in resource-poor settings. In this paper, we propose an algorithm for analysis of cervix images acquired using an android device, which can be used for the development of decision support system to provide instant decision during cervical cancer screening. This algorithm offers an accuracy of 97.94%, a sensitivity of 99.05% and specificity of 97.16%.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalMobile ApplicationsAcetic AcidAlgorithmsCervix UteriDeveloping CountriesFemaleHumansPhotographyPovertyReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTelemedicineUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAcetic AcidAndroid device-based cervical cancer screeningAutomated cervical cancer detectionLow-resource cervical cancer screening

Identifiers

PMID29777323
PMCPMC6148805
OpenAlexW2804384566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.