Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29777310›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2019

Mechanical sensitivity and psychological factors in patients with burning mouth syndrome.

Mika Honda, Takashi Iida, Hirona Kamiyama, Manabu Masuda, Misao Kawara, Peter Svensson, Osamu Komiyama

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Psychosomatic problems.British dental journal · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Mika HondaDepartment of Oral Function and Rehabilitation, Nihon University School of Dentistry at Matsudo, Matsudo, Chiba, Japan. mika.honda49@gmail.com.
Takashi IidaDepartment of Oral Function and Rehabilitation, Nihon University School of Dentistry at Matsudo, Matsudo, Chiba, Japan.
Hirona KamiyamaDepartment of Oral Function and Rehabilitation, Nihon University School of Dentistry at Matsudo, Matsudo, Chiba, Japan.
Manabu MasudaDepartment of Oral Function and Rehabilitation, Nihon University School of Dentistry at Matsudo, Matsudo, Chiba, Japan.
Misao KawaraDepartment of Oral Function and Rehabilitation, Nihon University School of Dentistry at Matsudo, Matsudo, Chiba, Japan.
Peter SvenssonSection of Orofacial Pain and Jaw Function, Department of Dentistry, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Osamu KomiyamaDepartment of Oral Function and Rehabilitation, Nihon University School of Dentistry at Matsudo, Matsudo, Chiba, Japan.
Nihon University · JPAarhus University · DK

Funding

grand in aid for scientific research from the Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science 17K11785grant in aid for scientific research from the Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science 17K11786
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to compare mechanical sensitivity on the tongue using quantitative sensory testing (QST) and psychological factors using the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) between burning mouth syndrome (BMS) patients and healthy participants. MATERIALS AND

methodsParticipants comprised 20 female BMS patients (68.1 ± 7.4 years) and 20 healthy females (65.4 ± 4.6 years). Psychological factors were evaluated with GHQ. Tactile detection thresholds (TDT) and filament-prick pain detection thresholds (FPT) were used to evaluate mechanical sensitivity on the tongue in all participants. TDT and FPT were measured on the tongue within both the painful area and the non-painful area in BMS patients, and on the tongue on both sides in healthy participants. As controls, TDT and FPT were measured with Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments on the skin of the mentum and palm in all participants.

resultsGHQ scores were significantly higher in BMS patients than in healthy participants (P = 0.024). No significant differences in TDT or FPT on the tongue, mentum, or palm were seen between BMS patients and healthy participants (P > 0.05). BMS patients showed no significant differences in TDT or FPT between the painful and non-painful areas on the tongue (P > 0.05). There were no significant correlations among TDT/FPT and GHQ score in BMS patients (P > 0.05).

conclusionsThese findings could indicate a more important role for psychological factors than mechanical sensitivity in BMS pathophysiology. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Pain on the tongue in elderly female patients with BMS may be more related to psychological factors.

Indexed as

AgedBurning Mouth SyndromeFemaleHumansJapanPain ThresholdPhysical StimulationSurveys and QuestionnairesTongueBurning mouth syndromePrimary orofacial painPsychological factorsQuantitative sensory testingTongue

Identifiers

PMID29777310
OpenAlexW2804482050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.