Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29777125›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Development of an Algorithm to Identify Patients with Physician-Documented Insomnia.

Uri Kartoun, Rahul Aggarwal, Andrew L Beam, Jennifer K Pai, Arnaub K Chatterjee, Timothy P Fitzgerald, Isaac S Kohane, Stanley Y Shaw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. High-throughput phenotyping with temporal sequences.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Uri KartounCenter for Systems Biology; Center for Assessment Technology & Continuous Health (CATCH), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Rahul AggarwalCenter for Systems Biology; Center for Assessment Technology & Continuous Health (CATCH), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Andrew L BeamHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jennifer K PaiMerck & Co., Inc., Boston, MA, USA.
Arnaub K ChatterjeeMerck & Co., Inc., Boston, MA, USA.
Timothy P FitzgeraldMerck & Co., Inc., West Point, PA, USA.
Isaac S KohaneHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Stanley Y ShawCenter for Systems Biology; Center for Assessment Technology & Continuous Health (CATCH), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. stanley_shaw@hms.harvard.edu.

Funding

TrainingU54HG007963 · NHGRI · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI KOHANE, ISAAC S., MURPHY, SHAWN N · 2014 to 2018
$18.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG007963
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed an insomnia classification algorithm by interrogating an electronic medical records (EMR) database of 314,292 patients. The patients received care at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH), or both, between 1992 and 2010. Our algorithm combined structured variables (such as International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision [ICD-9] codes, prescriptions, laboratory observations) and unstructured variables (such as text mentions of sleep and psychiatric disorders in clinical narrative notes). The highest classification performance of our algorithm was achieved when it included a combination of structured variables (billing codes for insomnia, common psychiatric conditions, and joint disorders) and unstructured variables (sleep disorders and psychiatric disorders). Our algorithm had superior performance in identifying insomnia patients compared to billing codes alone (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] = 0.83 vs. 0.55 with 95% confidence intervals [CI] of 0.76-0.90 and 0.51-0.58, respectively). When applied to the 314,292-patient population, our algorithm classified 36,810 of the patients with insomnia, of which less than 17% had a billing code for insomnia. In conclusion, an insomnia classification algorithm that incorporates clinical notes is superior to one based solely on billing codes. Compared to traditional methods, our study demonstrates that a classification algorithm that incorporates physician notes can more accurately, comprehensively, and quickly identify large cohorts of insomnia patients.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAgedArea Under CurveDatabases, FactualElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansInternational Classification of DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedPhysiciansROC CurveSleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders

Identifiers

PMID29777125
PMCPMC5959894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.