Promise and Challenges of Using Combined Moderator Methods to Personalize Mental Health Treatment.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Who benefits most from expectancy effects? A combined neuroimaging and antidepressant trial in depressed older adults.Translational psychiatry · 2021
   Trial
2. Moderators of Internet-Delivered Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Adolescents With Chronic Pain: Who Benefits From Treatment at Long-Term Follow-Up?The journal of pain
   Trial
3. Individual-Specific Animated Profiles of Mental Health.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025
   Article
4. Adapting dose-response methodology to improve clinical trial design for psychotherapies.The International journal of eating disorders · 2024
   Article
5. Predictors and moderators of treatment efficacy in reducing custodial grandmothers' psychological distress.Aging & mental health · 2022
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  A Machine Learning Approach to Identifying Placebo Responders in Late-Life Depression Trials.2018

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as