Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29776419›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2018

Introduction of national guidelines for restrictive blood transfusion threshold for hip fracture patients--a consecutive cohort study based on complete follow-up in national databases.

Bjarke Viberg, Per Hviid Gundtoft, Jesper Schønnemann, Lasse Pedersen, Lis Røhl Andersen, Kjell Titlestad, Carsten Fladmose Madsen, Jens Lauritsen, Søren Overgaard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Bjarke VibergDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Kolding Hospital - part of Hospital Lillebaelt, Sygehusvej 24, 6000, Kolding, Denmark. Bjarke.viberg@rsyd.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5169-4282
Per Hviid GundtoftDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Kolding Hospital - part of Hospital Lillebaelt, Sygehusvej 24, 6000, Kolding, Denmark.
Jesper SchønnemannDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Hospital of Southern Jutland, Kresten Philipsens Vej 15, 6200, Aabenraa, Denmark.
Lasse PedersenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Hospital of South West Jutland, Finsensgade 35, 6700, Esbjerg, Denmark.
Lis Røhl AndersenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Kolding Hospital - part of Hospital Lillebaelt, Sygehusvej 24, 6000, Kolding, Denmark.
Kjell TitlestadDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.
Carsten Fladmose MadsenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.
Jens LauritsenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.
Søren OvergaardDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.
University of Southern Denmark · DKKolding Hospital · DKOdense University Hospital · DKHospital South West Jutland · DKSygehus Sønderjylland · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRandomized controlled trials have demonstrated that a restrictive red blood cell (RBC) transfusion strategy lowers transfusion frequency without affecting mortality. However, the external validity of these trials has not been tested in a large cohort. The purpose was to estimate the effect of introducing a National Clinical Guideline (NCG) for a restrictive hemoglobin transfusion threshold on transfusion frequency and mortality in hip fracture patients > 65 years old.

methodsA consecutive cohort study of hip fracture patients > 65 years old residing in the southern region of Denmark was conducted using prospectively gathered data from registers during two separate 1-year time periods. The first period from October 1, 2012, to September 30, 2013, included 1494 patients and used a liberal transfusion threshold, whereas the second period from October 1, 2015, to September 30, 2016, including 1414 participants used a restrictive threshold from the NCG. Participant data for age, sex, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, time to surgery, and death were retrieved from the Danish Interdisciplinary Registry of Hip Fractures and were merged with RBC transfusion and medication data extracted from the Danish Transfusion and Odense Pharmacoepidemiological Databases, respectively. Cox proportional hazards models were used to test relative mortality risk for the restrictive group compared with the liberal group at 30 and 90 days.

resultsOverall RBC transfusions decreased from 42 to 30% (p < 0.001). The 30-day mortality rate (95% CI) was 9% (8;11) in the restrictive group and 13% (11;14) in the liberal group (p < 0.008), whereas the adjusted relative mortality risk was 0.72 (0.57;0.91). The 90-day mortality rate was 15% (13;17) in the restrictive group and 19% (17;21) in the liberal group, whereas the adjusted relative mortality risk was 0.78 (0.65;0.94).

conclusionThese data suggest that the introduction of an NCG on restrictive blood transfusion leads to lower transfusion frequency in hip fracture patients > 65 years old. Even though this reduction is associated with decreased mortality at both 30 and 90 days, it may be explained by other issues than restrictive transfusion strategy. There has been an improvement in the mortality of hip fracture patients in Denmark, and we suggest that a restrictive transfusion strategy does not lead to increased mortality.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBlood TransfusionCohort StudiesDatabases, FactualDenmarkFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHip FracturesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMalePractice Guidelines as TopicProspective StudiesHip fractureLiberalMortalityRestrictiveTransfusion

Identifiers

PMID29776419
PMCPMC5960120
OpenAlexW2803923665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.