ArticleHealth research policy and systems2018
The AGING Initiative experience: a call for sustained support for team science networks.
Article in Health research policy and systems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Descriptive Epidemiology of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in US Nursing Home Residents With Heart Failure.Current problems in cardiology · 2023Review
- Stakeholders' views on priorities essential for establishing a supportive environment for clinical trials in nursing homes.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2022Article
- The geriatrics research instrument library: A resource for guiding instrument selection for researchers studying older adults with multiple chronic conditions.Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity · 2022Article
- Innovative Strategies to Facilitate Patient-Centered Research in Multiple Chronic Conditions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- A team science approach to discover novel targets for infantile spasms (IS).Epilepsia open · 2021Article
- Visioning the Future of Gerontological Digital Social Work.Journal of gerontological social work · 2020Review
- Identifying strategies to promote team science in dissemination and implementation research.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2019Article
- Correction to: The AGING Initiative experience: a call for sustained support for team science networks.Health research policy and systems · 2019Article
- Advancing cross-national planning and partnership: Proceedings from the International Multimorbidity Symposium 2019.Journal of comorbidityArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Team science, defined as collaborative research efforts that leverage the expertise of diverse disciplines, is recognised as a critical means to address complex healthcare challenges, but the practical implementation of team science can be difficult. Our objective is to describe the barriers, solutions and lessons learned from our team science experience as applied to the complex and growing challenge of multiple chronic conditions (MCC). MCC is the presence of two or more chronic conditions that have a collective adverse effect on health status, function or quality of life, and that require complex healthcare management, decision-making or coordination. Due to the increasing impact on the United States society, MCC research has been identified as a high priority research area by multiple federal agencies. In response to this need, two national research entities, the Healthcare Systems Research Network (HCSRN) and the Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Centers (OAIC), formed the Advancing Geriatrics Infrastructure and Network Growth (AGING) Initiative to build nationwide capacity for MCC team science. This article describes the structure, lessons learned and initial outcomes of the AGING Initiative. We call for funding mechanisms to sustain infrastructures that have demonstrated success in fostering team science and innovation in translating findings to policy change necessary to solve complex problems in healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.