Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29776410›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2018

Use of a counsellor supported disclosure model to improve the uptake of couple HIV testing and counselling in Kenya: a quasi-experimental study.

Margaret Kababu, Eric Sakwa, Robinson Karuga, Annrita Ikahu, Inviolata Njeri, Jordan Kyongo, Catherine Khamali, Wanjiru Mukoma

Open access · goldAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Margaret KababuLVCT Health, Nairobi, Kenya. Margaret.Kababu@lvcthealth.org.ORCID 0000-0001-8801-1991
Eric SakwaRoot capital, Nairobi, Kenya.
Robinson KarugaLVCT Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
Annrita IkahuLVCT Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
Inviolata NjeriLVCT Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
Jordan KyongoLVCT Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
Catherine KhamaliTrocaire, Nairobi, Kenya.
Wanjiru MukomaLVCT Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
LVCT Health · KE

Funding

Trocaire No: KEN 1201-05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeterosexual couples account for 44% of new HIV infections in Kenya and there's low awareness of self and partner HIV status. Different strategies have been employed to promote couple HIV testing and counselling (CHTC). Despite this, HIV incidence among couples continues to rise. This study sought to assess the use of a counsellor-supported disclosure (CSD) model in enhancing the uptake of CHTC and the factors that were associated with it.

methodsA pre-post quasi experimental study design with an intervention and a comparison arm was utilized. The study was conducted in Nairobi, Nakuru, Kisumu, and Homa Bay counties in Kenya. A total of 276 participants were recruited; 149 and 127 in the comparison and intervention arms, respectively. Standard HIV testing & counselling (HTC) was offered in the comparison arm whereas the counsellor-supported disclosure model was administered in the intervention arm. The model empowered index clients to invite their sexual partner for CHTC. Telephone follow-up and subsequent community health volunteer (CHV) follow-up for non-responders were embedded in the model. Semi-structured questionnaires were used to collect data at baseline and 3 months into the study. In-depth interviews were conducted with 15 participants who took up the intervention and 7 of the HTC providers who offered CSD. The quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed using STATA version 13 and NVIVO 10, respectively.

resultsUptake of CHTC was 28% in the intervention arm of the study compared to 7% in the comparison arm (p < 0.001). Participants in the intervention arm of the study had eight times higher odds of taking up CHTC compared to their counterparts. The outcome of the qualitative interviews revealed that the CSD counselling, skills on partner invitation, and follow-up for partner invitation increased the uptake of CHTC. On the other hand, unwillingness to test together with partner, lack of availability to test together as a couple, and provision of the wrong contact information by the participants reduced the uptake of CHTC.

conclusionThe CSD model improved the uptake of CHTC. This model can be integrated into the existing HTC structures to enhance the uptake of CHTC.

Indexed as

Professional-Patient RelationsTruth DisclosureAdolescentAdultCounselingCounselorsFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansKenyaMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedModels, OrganizationalPatient Acceptance of Health CareQualitative ResearchCounsellor supported disclosure (CSD)Couple HIV testing and counselling (CHTC)HIV discordant couplesHIV status disclosureIntervention

Identifiers

PMID29776410
PMCPMC5960164
OpenAlexW2805271750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.