Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29776384›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2018

Competence of mosquitoes native to the United Kingdom to support replication and transmission of Rift Valley fever virus.

Sarah Lumley, Luis M Hernández-Triana, Daniel L Horton, Maria Del Mar Fernández de Marco, Jolyon M Medlock, Roger Hewson, Anthony R Fooks, Nicholas Johnson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Viruses · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Metavirome Analysis ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah LumleyMicrobiology Services Division, Public Health England, Wiltshire, UK. sarah.lumley@phe.gov.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8605-3650
Luis M Hernández-TrianaWildlife Zoonoses and Vector-borne Diseases Research Group, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, Surrey, UK.
Daniel L HortonSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Maria Del Mar Fernández de MarcoWildlife Zoonoses and Vector-borne Diseases Research Group, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, Surrey, UK.
Jolyon M MedlockMicrobiology Services Division, Public Health England, Wiltshire, UK.
Roger HewsonMicrobiology Services Division, Public Health England, Wiltshire, UK.
Anthony R FooksWildlife Zoonoses and Vector-borne Diseases Research Group, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, Surrey, UK.
Nicholas JohnsonSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Animal and Plant Health Agency · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBPublic Health England · GBUniversity of Surrey · GB

Funding

Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency SV3045 and SE4113Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/I/00007039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRift Valley fever phlebovirus (RVFV) is a mosquito-borne arbovirus causing severe disease in humans and livestock. It is endemic in Africa and spread to the Arabian Peninsula in 2000 raising concerns it could emerge in Europe. The ability of temperate mosquitoes from the United Kingdom (UK) to support replication and transmission of RVFV is unknown.

methodsIn this study, two colonised lines of Culex pipiens, wild-caught Aedes detritus and Ae. rusticus from the UK were infected with pathogenic strains of RVFV to assess their vector competence. Mosquitoes were offered artificial blood-meals containing 10

resultsAcross temperatures, doses and strains the average infection, dissemination and transmission rates were: 35, 13 and 5% (n = 91) for Cx. pipiens (Caldbeck); 23, 14 and 5% (n = 138) for Cx. pipiens (Brookwood); 36, 28 and 7% (n = 118) for Ae. detritus. However, despite 35% (n = 20) being susceptible to infection, Ae. rusticus did not transmit RVFV. Survival of Aedes species was negatively affected by maintenance at 25 °C compared to the more representative peak average British summer temperature of 20 °C. Increased mortality was also observed with some species infected with 10

conclusionsIt can be concluded that temperate mosquito species present in the UK demonstrate a transmission potential for RVFV in the laboratory but, even at high temperatures, this occurred at low efficiency.

Indexed as

AedesAnimalsCulexHumansMosquito VectorsRift Valley FeverRift Valley fever virusSalivaSeasonsTemperatureUnited KingdomArbovirusMosquitoRift Valley fever virusUKVector competence

Identifiers

PMID29776384
PMCPMC5960175
OpenAlexW2805738436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.