Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29776369›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2018

Prevention and treatment of malaria in pregnancy: what do pregnant women and health care workers in East India know and do about it?

Lora Sabin, Evan M S Hecht, Mohamad I Brooks, Mrigendra P Singh, Kojo Yeboah-Antwi, Abanish Rizal, Blair J Wylie, Philip A Bondzie, Matthew Banos, Jordan Tuchman and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. [Malaria infection during pregnancy in Niamey, Niger].The Pan African medical journal · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Lora SabinDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, 801 Massachusetts Ave, Boston, MA, USA. lsabin@bu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2782-542X
Evan M S HechtDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, 801 Massachusetts Ave, Boston, MA, USA.
Mohamad I BrooksPathfinder, International, 9 Galen Street, Suite 217, Watertown, MA, USA.
Mrigendra P SinghICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research Field Station, IDVC Mission Medical College Campus, Jabalpur, India.
Kojo Yeboah-AntwiDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, 801 Massachusetts Ave, Boston, MA, USA.
Abanish RizalHarvard University, Massachusetts Hall, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Blair J WylieDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, USA.
Philip A BondzieBoston University School of Medicine, 72 East Concord St, Boston, MA, USA.
Matthew BanosDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, 801 Massachusetts Ave, Boston, MA, USA.
Jordan TuchmanAbt Associates, 4550 Montgomery Ave, #800N, Bethesda, MA, USA.
Neeru SinghICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research Field Station, IDVC Mission Medical College Campus, Jabalpur, India.
Davidson H HamerDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, 801 Massachusetts Ave, Boston, MA, USA.
Boston University · USNational Institute of Malaria Research · INAbt Global (United States) · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USHarvard University Press · USPathfinder International · US

Funding

Burden of Malaria in Pregnancy in IndiaR03HD052167 · NICHD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI HAMER, DAVIDSON HOWES · 2006 to 2007
$160k
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development 1R03-HD052167-01NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD052167United States Agency for International Development GHS-A-00-03-00020-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLimited qualitative research has been performed in India to investigate views and behaviours of pregnant women regarding malaria despite the threat of malaria-related adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. To address this gap, a comprehensive study on malaria prevention and treatment attitudes, knowledge and behaviour among pregnant women in India was conducted.

methodsPregnant women and healthcare workers (HCWs), encompassing clinic-based providers, traditional birth attendants, and auxiliary nurse-midwives were enrolled for in-depth interviews (IDIs) at 7 hospital sites and nearby communities in Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh States. Questions addressed health concerns and attitudes, knowledge and practices regarding malaria prevention and treatment; probing covered modern and traditional approaches. Data were analyzed using a thematic approach.

resultsA total of 83 pregnant women and 119 HCWs participated in 202 IDIs, 90 in Jharkhand and 112 in Chhattisgarh. A majority of Jharkhand respondents, but only one-fourth in Chhattisgarh, named malaria among top health issues for pregnant women. Just over half of pregnant women were willing to try new prevention methods (especially insecticide-treated bed nets), although cost-related barriers to such methods were stressed. Most respondents voiced concerns about malaria treatment during pregnancy, mainly citing potential harm to the baby. Most knew that mosquitoes transmitted malaria, but a substantial minority, including among HCWs, described incorrect transmission modes. Most knew a proven prevention method (usually bed nets or coils); a few knew other methods. A minority of pregnant women, but most HCWs, knew about malaria treatment, although some HCWs described unproven treatments. Most respondents described use of modern prevention methods in their communities, typically bed nets, although probing revealed irregular use. Half (especially in Jharkhand and particularly HCWs) described use of traditional prevention approaches such as burning leaves and rubbing oils on the body; traditional remedies for malaria treatment were common, and varied by site and population.

conclusionsUnderstanding of malaria varied as a concern for pregnant women, continued use of unproven malaria prevention and treatment strategies was evident in this population in India. These results highlight the need to educate both pregnant women and HCWs about effective malaria methods to protect pregnant women and their babies from malaria.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultClinical CompetenceFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMalariaMiddle AgedPregnancyPregnant PeopleYoung AdultIndiaMalaria in pregnancyMalaria preventionMalaria treatmentNeemQualitative researchTraditional remedies

Identifiers

PMID29776369
PMCPMC5960115
OpenAlexW2806739079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.