Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29776346›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2018

A systematic review of the risk factors for clinical response to opioids for all-age patients with cancer-related pain and presentation of the paediatric STOP pain study.

Ersilia Lucenteforte, Laura Vagnoli, Alessandra Pugi, Giada Crescioli, Niccolò Lombardi, Roberto Bonaiuti, Maurizio Aricò, Sabrina Giglio, Andrea Messeri, Alessandro Mugelli and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ersilia LucenteforteDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Children's Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Laura VagnoliPain and Palliative Care Unit, Meyer children's hospital, Florence, Italy.
Alessandra PugiClinical Trial Office, Meyer Children's Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Giada CrescioliDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Children's Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Niccolò LombardiDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Children's Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Roberto BonaiutiDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Children's Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Maurizio AricòDirezione Generale, Azienda Sanitaria Provinciale, Ragusa, Italy.
Sabrina GiglioMedical Genetics Unit, Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Andrea MesseriPain and Palliative Care Unit, Meyer children's hospital, Florence, Italy.
Alessandro MugelliDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Children's Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Alfredo VannacciDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Children's Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Valentina MagginiDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Children's Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy. valentina.maggini@unifi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4227-7214
University of Florence · ITMeyer Children's Hospital · ITAgenzia Regionale Sanitaria della Puglia · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro 10465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInter-patient variability in response to opioids is well known but a comprehensive definition of its pathophysiological mechanism is still lacking and, more importantly, no studies have focused on children. The STOP Pain project aimed to evaluate the risk factors that contribute to clinical response and adverse drug reactions to opioids by means of a systematic review and a clinical investigation on paediatric oncological patients.

methodsWe conducted a systematic literature search in EMBASE and PubMed up to the 24th of November 2016 following Cochrane Handbook and PRISMA guidelines. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts along with full-text papers; disagreements were resolved by discussion with two other independent reviewers. We used a data extraction form to provide details of the included studies, and conducted quality assessment using the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies.

resultsYoung age, lung or gastrointestinal cancer, neuropathic or breakthrough pain and anxiety or sleep disturbance were associated to a worse response to opioid analgesia. No clear association was identified in literature regarding gender, ethnicity, weight, presence of metastases, biochemical or hematological factors. Studies in children were lacking. Between June 2011 and April 2014, the Italian STOP Pain project enrolled 87 paediatric cancer patients under treatment with opioids (morphine, codeine, oxycodone, fentanyl and tramadol).

conclusionsFuture studies on cancer pain should be designed with consideration for the highlighted factors to enhance our understanding of opioid non-response and safety. Studies in children are mandatory.

trial registrationCRD42017057740 .

Indexed as

Age FactorsAnalgesics, OpioidBiological Variation, PopulationCancer PainChildHumansLongitudinal StudiesNeoplasmsPain MeasurementRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeAnalgesics, OpioidCancer painChildrenOpioid efficacyOpioid safety

Identifiers

PMID29776346
PMCPMC5960169
OpenAlexW2803912636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.