ArticleBiometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift2018
Cox model with interval-censored covariate in cohort studies.
Article in Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proportional Hazards Regression for Interval-Censored Outcomes With an Interval-Censored Covariate.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
- Associations of the updated nutrient profiling system underlying the Nutri-Score label with weight gain, overweight and obesity risk in the French NutriNet-Santé cohort.European journal of nutrition · 2026Article
- Predictors of delay in the cervical cancer care cascade in Kampala, Uganda.BMC women's health · 2026Article
- SPARCC: Semi-Parametric Robust Estimation in a Right-Censored Covariate Model.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2026Article
- SEMIPARAMETRIC LINEAR REGRESSION WITH AN INTERVAL-CENSORED COVARIATE IN THE ATHEROSCLEROSIS RISK IN COMMUNITIES STUDY.The annals of applied statistics · 2024Article
- Making Sense of Censored Covariates: Statistical Methods for Studies of Huntington's Disease.Annual review of statistics and its application · 2024Article
- Understanding the implications of a complete case analysis for regression models with a right-censored covariate.The American statistician · 2024Article
- Contribution of socioeconomic, lifestyle, and medical risk factors to disparities in dementia and mortality.SSM - population health · 2021Article
- Coupling sparse Cox models with clustering of longitudinal transcriptomics data for trauma prognosis.BioData mining · 2021Article
- Ultra-processed food intake in association with BMI change and risk of overweight and obesity: A prospective analysis of the French NutriNet-Santé cohort.PLoS medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In cohort studies the outcome is often time to a particular event, and subjects are followed at regular intervals. Periodic visits may also monitor a secondary irreversible event influencing the event of primary interest, and a significant proportion of subjects develop the secondary event over the period of follow-up. The status of the secondary event serves as a time-varying covariate, but is recorded only at the times of the scheduled visits, generating incomplete time-varying covariates. While information on a typical time-varying covariate is missing for entire follow-up period except the visiting times, the status of the secondary event are unavailable only between visits where the status has changed, thus interval-censored. One may view interval-censored covariate of the secondary event status as missing time-varying covariates, yet missingness is partial since partial information is provided throughout the follow-up period. Current practice of using the latest observed status produces biased estimators, and the existing missing covariate techniques cannot accommodate the special feature of missingness due to interval censoring. To handle interval-censored covariates in the Cox proportional hazards model, we propose an available-data estimator, a doubly robust-type estimator as well as the maximum likelihood estimator via EM algorithm and present their asymptotic properties. We also present practical approaches that are valid. We demonstrate the proposed methods using our motivating example from the Northern Manhattan Study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.