Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29774480›Full record

ArticleCognitive processing2018

Topographical assessment of neurocortical connectivity by using directed transfer function and partial directed coherence during meditation.

Laxmi Shaw, Aurobinda Routray

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive processing, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Laxmi ShawDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, 721302, India. laxmishaw1983@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8238-1999
Aurobinda RoutrayDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, 721302, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2750-6768

Funding

Ministry of Human Resource Development CEH
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the presence of nonlinearity and volume conduction in electroencephalography (EEG), sometimes it's challenging to find out the actual brain network from neurodynamical alteration. In this paper, two well-known time-frequency brain connectivity measures, namely partial directed coherence (PDC) and directed transfer function (DTF), have been applied to evaluate the performance analysis of EEG signals obtained during meditation. These measures are implemented to the multichannel meditation EEG data to get the directed neural information flow. Mostly the assessment of PDC and DTF is entirely subjective and there are probabilities to have erroneous connectivity estimation. To avoid the subjective evaluation, the performance results are compared in terms of absolute energy, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and relative SNR (R-SNR) scale. In most of the cases, the PDC result is found to be more efficient than DTF. The limitation of DTF and PDC in terms of the time-varying multivariate autoregressive (MVAR) model is highlighted. The time-varying MVAR model can track the neurodynamical changes better than any other method. In the present study, we would like to show that the PDC-based connectivity gives a better understanding of the non-symmetric relation in EEG obtained during Kriya Yoga meditation in comparison to DTF. However, it needs to be investigated further to warrant this claim.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyMeditationAdultAlgorithmsBrain MappingCerebral CortexFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeural PathwaysNeuropsychological TestsSignal-To-Noise RatioYogaYoung AdultBrain connectivityEEGMeditationMultivariate autoregressive modelPartial directed coherenceVolume conduction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.