Cefepime vs. cefoperazone/sulbactam in combination with amikacin as empirical antibiotic therapy in febrile neutropenia.

purposeBeta lactams are standard empirical therapy for febrile neutropenia (FN). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cefepime monotherapy compared with cefoperazone/sulbactam plus amikacin (CS + A) for empirical treatment of high risk FN.

methodsOne hundred seventy-five patients with 336 FN episodes were randomized to receive either cefepime (2 g q8h for adults and 50 mg/kg q8h for children) or CS (2 g q8h for adults and 50 mg/kg q8h for children) plus amikacin (15 mg/kg once a day). Positive response was defined as afebrile within 72 h of starting antibiotics, persistent afebrile status more than 48 h and no requirement of second-line antibiotics and antifungal agents.

resultsThree hundred thirty-six episodes were assessable for efficacy (168 cefepime, 168 CS + A). The positive response to antibiotics was identical for cefepime (53%) and CS + A (53%). Positive response was similar in MDI (microbiologically documented infection), 50 vs. 35% (p = 0.248), CDI (clinically documented infection), 50 vs. 35% (p = 0.259), combination CDI + MDI, 25 vs. 15% (p = 0.400), FUO (fever of unknown origin), 68 vs. 72% (p = 0.577) respectively in the two groups. The successful discontinuation of antibiotics at 72 h in FUO was similar in both groups (60 vs. 59%, p = 0.544). Total drug-related adverse events were similar in both groups (8 vs. 6%) except renal dysfunction was high in CS + A (1 vs. 7 events). Mortality was the same between two groups (8 vs 7%).

conclusionsCefepime monotherapy and CS + A had similar efficacy as first-line therapy for FN. Discontinuation of empirical antibiotics is safe and feasible approach in selected group of FUO patients.