ReviewCurrent urology reports2018
Male Fertility Preservation.
Review in Current urology reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Immune-modulating medications: the masquerading culprit of epididymo-orchitis.BMJ case reports · 2026Article
- Utilizing artificial intelligence in academic writing: an in-depth evaluation of a scientific review on fertility preservation written by ChatGPT-4.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Article
- The antiapoptotic effects of conditioned medium from bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal stem cells on cyclophosphamide-induced testicular damage in rat: An experimental study.International journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2024Article
- Review
- The Effects of Glutathione on Clinically Essential Fertility Parameters in a Bleomycin Etoposide Cisplatin Chemotherapy Model.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Natural Cryoprotective and Cytoprotective Agents in Cryopreservation: A Focus on Melatonin.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Fertility preservation is an imperative goal in the clinical practice of radiation oncology: a narrative review.Ecancermedicalscience · 2022Review
- Oncofertility in pediatric patients: current perspectives.Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2022Review
- Satisfaction with Fertility Preservation Decisions among Adolescent Males with Cancer: A Mixed Methods Study.Cancers · 2021Article
- Family communication about fertility preservation in adolescent males newly diagnosed with cancer.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2021Article
- Macrophage ubiquitin-specific protease 2 contributes to motility, hyperactivation, capacitation, and in vitro fertilization activity of mouse sperm.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021Article
- Fertility considerations in men with testicular cancer.Translational andrology and urology · 2020Review
- Cryopreservation Differentially Alters the Proteome of Epididymal and Ejaculated Pig Spermatozoa.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewWith improvements in cancer treatment outcomes and an increase in cancer survivorship, understanding the importance of fertility preservation options prior to undergoing cancer treatment is essential. Therefore, we review herein the effect of cancer and its treatment on male fertility, the rationale for sperm cryopreservation, options for sperm retrieval, ART outcomes, and experimental options. RECENT
findingsRecent data update fertility outcomes with newer cancer therapies and provide longitudinal insight into survivor paternity with and without fertility preservation. Likewise, updated ART outcomes and future preservation options are discussed. The effect of cancer and its treatment on spermatogenesis is well established. Sperm cryopreservation is the best pre-treatment insurance for the opportunity of future fertility. Post-therapy patients may also achieve fertility restoration with ART, using cryopreserved or freshly obtained sperm. Meanwhile, utilization of cryopreserved testicular stem cells for future transfer or for in vitro maturation represents exciting alternatives on the horizon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29774444What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.