Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29774418›Full record

Observational studyGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2018

Prevalence of glaucoma in Germany: results from the Gutenberg Health Study.

René Höhn, Stefan Nickels, Alexander K Schuster, Philipp S Wild, Thomas Münzel, Karl J Lackner, Irene Schmidtmann, Manfred Beutel, Norbert Pfeiffer

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. [Glaucoma in infancy and childhood].Die Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. [Glaucoma care in Germany-Results of a survey among German ophthalmologists-Part 1: diagnostics].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Risk factors for open-angle glaucoma and recommendations for glaucoma screening.Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. [Risk factors for open-angle glaucoma and recommendations for glaucoma screening].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

René HöhnDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany. rene.hoehn@insel.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2870-1469
Stefan NickelsDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Alexander K SchusterDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Philipp S WildPreventive Cardiology and Preventive Medicine/Center for Cardiology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Thomas MünzelCenter for Cardiology I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Karl J LacknerDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Irene SchmidtmannInstitute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Manfred BeutelDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Norbert PfeifferDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the prevalence of glaucoma according to the International Society for Geographical and Epidemiological Ophthalmology (ISGEO) classification in an adult German cohort.

methodsThe Gutenberg Health Study is a population-based, prospective cohort study in the Rhine-Main Region in mid-western Germany with a total of 15,010 participants. In this study, the first 5000 subjects with an age range between 35 and 74 years were included. Optic disk pictures were obtained by a non-mydriatic fundus camera (Visucam™) and analyzed using the Visupac™ software. Glaucoma prevalence was determined in two steps. First, the ISGEO classification was applied using "hypernormal subjects" (normal visual field) as reference. In the second analysis, we additionally considered the disk area (DA) in relation to the vertical cup-to-disk ratio by quantile regression. All results are given as weighted numbers for the population of Mainz/Bingen.

resultsThe prevalence of definite glaucoma in our sample was 1.44% (n = 72). The prevalence adjusted for disk area was 1.34% (n = 67). The prevalence gradually increased in both models with each decade of age (from 0.9 to 2.4%, respectively). In both models, none of the glaucoma cases had a small optic disk (< 1.6 mm

conclusionsThe prevalence of definite glaucoma was similar to other European population-based cohorts, with slightly higher prevalence in younger subjects. Our analysis highlighted the influence of optic disk size in determining the diagnosis of glaucoma based on cup-to-disk ratio in epidemiological studies.

Indexed as

Visual AcuityAdultAgedCorneaCorneal TopographyFemaleGermanyGlaucomaHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMicroscopy, AcousticMiddle AgedOptic DiskPopulation SurveillancePrevalenceGlaucomaGutenberg Health StudyISGEOPopulation-based cohortPrevalence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.