Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29774407›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2018

Beta blockers and chronic heart failure patients: prognostic impact of a dose targeted beta blocker therapy vs. heart rate targeted strategy.

Anna Corletto, Hanna Fröhlich, Tobias Täger, Matthias Hochadel, Ralf Zahn, Caroline Kilkowski, Ralph Winkler, Jochen Senges, Hugo A Katus, Lutz Frankenstein

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Five-year results of heart rate control with ivabradine or metoprolol succinate in patients after heart transplantation.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anna CorlettoDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, and Pulmology, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69221, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hanna FröhlichDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, and Pulmology, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69221, Heidelberg, Germany.
Tobias TägerDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, and Pulmology, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69221, Heidelberg, Germany.
Matthias HochadelMedizinische Klinik B-Abteilung für Kardiologie, Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen GmbH, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, 67059, Germany.
Ralf ZahnMedizinische Klinik B-Abteilung für Kardiologie, Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen GmbH, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, 67059, Germany.
Caroline KilkowskiMedizinische Klinik B-Abteilung für Kardiologie, Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen GmbH, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, 67059, Germany.
Ralph WinklerMedizinische Klinik B-Abteilung für Kardiologie, Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen GmbH, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, 67059, Germany.
Jochen SengesStiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung, Bremserstraße 79, 67063, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany.
Hugo A KatusDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, and Pulmology, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69221, Heidelberg, Germany.
Lutz FrankensteinDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, and Pulmology, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69221, Heidelberg, Germany. lutz.frankenstein@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7216-1004
Heidelberg University · DEKlinikum Ludwigshafen · DEStiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBeta blockers improve survival in patients with chronic systolic heart failure (CHF). Whether physicians should aim for target dose, target heart rate (HR), or both is still under debate. METHODS AND

resultsWe identified 1,669 patients with systolic CHF due to ischemic heart disease or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy from the University Hospital Heidelberg and the Clinic of Ludwigshafen, Germany. All patients were treated with an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker and had a history of CHF known for at least 6 months. Target dose was defined as treatment with ≥ 95% of the respective published guideline-recommended dose. Target HR was defined as 51-69 bpm. All-cause mortality during the median follow-up of 42.8 months was analysed with respect to beta blocker dosing and resting HR. 201 (12%) patients met the dose target (group A), 285 (17.1%) met the HR target (group B), 627 (37.6%) met no target (group C), and 556 (33.3%) did not receive beta blockers (Group D). 5-year mortality was 23.7, 22.7, 37.6, and 55.6% for group A, B, C, and D, respectively (p <  0.001). Survival for group A patients with a HR ≥ 70 bpm was 28.8% but 14.8% if HR was 50-70 bpm (p = 0.054).

conclusionsAchieving guidelines recommended beta blocker dose or to HR control has a similar positive impact on survival. When on target dose, supplemental HR control additionally improves survival.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsCarvedilolCause of DeathFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGermanyHeart Failure, SystolicHeart RateHumansMaleMetoprololMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesStroke VolumeSurvival RateAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsCarvedilolMetoprololBeta blockerClinicHeart failureHeart rate

Identifiers

PMID29774407
OpenAlexW2804188279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.