Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29774403›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2018

Anti-osteoporosis drug use: too little, too much, or just right? The HUNT study, Norway.

M Hoff, S Skurtveit, H E Meyer, A Langhammer, A J Søgaard, U Syversen, E Skovlund, B Abrahamsen, S Forsmo, B Schei

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Epidemiology of forearm fractures in women and men in Norway 2008-2019.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Time-varying exposure to anti-osteoporosis drugs and risk of first-time hip fracture: a population wide study within the Norwegian Epidemiologic Osteoporosis Studies (NOREPOS).Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Does treatment with bisphosphonates protect against fractures in real life? The HUNT study, Norway.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) for osteoporosis screening in US postmenopausal women: is it cost-effective?Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

M HoffDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway. mari.hoff@ntnu.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9992-8663
S SkurtveitNorwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
H E MeyerNorwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
A LanghammerDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
A J SøgaardNorwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
U SyversenDepartment of Endocrinology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
E SkovlundDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
B AbrahamsenDepartment of Medicine, Holbæk Hospital, Holbæk, Denmark.
S ForsmoDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
B ScheiDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Norwegian Institute of Public Health · NONorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOSt Olav's University Hospital · NOUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Use of anti-osteoporotic drugs (AODs) was examined in a Norwegian population 50-85 years. Among them with Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) score for major osteoporotic fracture ≥ 20, 25% of the women and 17% of the men received AODs. The strongest predictors for AODs were high age in women and use of glucocorticoids among men.

introductionTo examine the use of anti-osteoporotic drugs (AODs) and to identify predictors for prescriptions.

methodsData were obtained from the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT3) performed in 2006-2008 and the Norwegian Prescription Database, including 15,075 women and 13,386 men aged 50-85 years. Bone mineral density (BMD) in the femoral neck was measured in a subgroup of 4538 women and 2322 men. High fracture risk was defined as a FRAX score for major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) ≥ 20%; in the subgroup with BMD, high risk was in addition defined as FRAX

resultsAmong individuals with FRAX MOF ≥ 20%, 25% of the women and 17% of the men were treated with AODs. Among those with FRAX MOF < 20%, 3% and 1% were treated, respectively. In the subgroup with BMD measurement, 24% of the women and 16% of the men at high risk of fractures were treated, compared to 3 and 1% in women and men not fulfilling the criteria. In women, high age was the strongest predictor for treatment (HR 3.84: 95% confidence interval 2.81-5.24), followed by use of glucocorticoids (GCs) (2.68:1.84-3.89). In men, predictors were use of GCs (5.28: 2.70-10.35) followed by multimorbidity (3.16:1.31-7.63). In the subgroup with BMD, T-score ≤ - 2.5 was the strongest predictor (women 3.98:2.67-5.89; men 13.31:6.17-28.74).

conclusionsThis study suggests an undertreatment of AODs in individuals at high risk of fracture.

Indexed as

Absorptiometry, PhotonAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsDatabases, FactualDrug PrescriptionsDrug UtilizationFemaleFemur NeckGlucocorticoidsHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedBone Density Conservation AgentsGlucocorticoidsAnti-osteoporotic drugsGeneral population studiesHUNTOsteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID29774403
OpenAlexW2803453785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.