Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29774393›Full record

ReviewPediatric cardiology2018

Developmental Origin of the Cardiac Conduction System: Insight from Lineage Tracing.

Rajiv A Mohan, Bastiaan J Boukens, Vincent M Christoffels

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Development of the Cardiac Conduction System.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  8. DbhNature communications · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rajiv A MohanDepartment of Medical Biology, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3622-1759
Bastiaan J BoukensDepartment of Medical Biology, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Vincent M ChristoffelsDepartment of Medical Biology, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. v.m.christoffels@amc.uva.nl.
University of Amsterdam · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NL

Funding

Hartstichting 2016T047ZonMw 91212086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The components of the cardiac conduction system (CCS) generate and propagate the electrical impulse that initiates cardiac contraction. These interconnected components share properties, such as automaticity, that set them apart from the working myocardium of the atria and ventricles. A variety of tools and approaches have been used to define the CCS lineages. These include genetic labeling of cells expressing lineage markers and fate mapping of dye labeled cells, which we will discuss in this review. We conclude that there is not a single CCS lineage, but instead early cell fate decisions segregate the lineages of the CCS components while they remain interconnected. The latter is relevant for development of therapies for conduction system disease that focus on reprogramming cardiomyocytes or instruction of pluripotent stem cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationHeart Conduction SystemHeart VentriclesHumansMyocardiumMyocytes, CardiacCardiac conduction systemCardiac developmentGenetic inducible fate mapLineage tracing

Identifiers

PMID29774393
PMCPMC6096846
OpenAlexW2803492125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.