Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29774238›Full record

ArticleScience advances2018

Chitinase genes (

Christopher A Emerling, Frédéric Delsuc, Michael W Nachman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
17.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Molecular Evolution of theAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Roles of the gut microbiota in the adaptive evolution of mammalian species.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. How interactions with plant chemicals shape insect genomes.Current opinion in insect science · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Christopher A EmerlingMuseum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Frédéric DelsucInstitut des Sciences de l'Évolution de Montpellier (ISEM), Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6501-6287
Michael W NachmanMuseum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4321-5135
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRMuseum of Vertebrate Zoology · US

Funding

European Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The end-Cretaceous extinction led to a massive faunal turnover, with placental mammals radiating in the wake of nonavian dinosaurs. Fossils indicate that Cretaceous stem placentals were generally insectivorous, whereas their earliest Cenozoic descendants occupied a variety of dietary niches. It is hypothesized that this dietary radiation resulted from the opening of niche space, following the extinction of dinosaurian carnivores and herbivores. We provide the first genomic evidence for the occurrence and timing of this dietary radiation in placental mammals. By comparing the genomes of 107 placental mammals, we robustly infer that chitinase genes (

Indexed as

Extinction, BiologicalFossilsGenomeGenomicsPlacentaAnimal FeedAnimalsBiological EvolutionCarnivoryChitinasesFemaleGene DosageHerbivoryMammalsPhylogenyPregnancyChitinases

Identifiers

PMID29774238
PMCPMC5955627
OpenAlexW2804874224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.