Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29774227›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-centered research and reviews2018

Identifying What Matters to Hysterectomy Patients: Postsurgery Perceptions, Beliefs, and Experiences.

Andrew S Bossick, Roopina Sangha, Heather Olden, Gwen L Alexander, Ganesa Wegienka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-centered research and reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Patient Perceptions of Planned Organ Removal During Hysterectomy.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2019
    Article
  13. Uncertainty and Competing Priorities in Shared Clinical Decision-Making.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrew S BossickDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Patient-Engaged Research Center, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
Roopina SanghaDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Patient-Engaged Research Center, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
Heather OldenDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Patient-Engaged Research Center, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
Gwen L AlexanderDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Patient-Engaged Research Center, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
Ganesa WegienkaDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Patient-Engaged Research Center, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.

Funding

Personalizing Care for Obese Patients in an Urban Health SystemR24HS022417 · AHRQ · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI JOHNSON, CHRISTINE C · 2013 to 2017
$4.9M
AHRQ HHS R24 HS022417
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHysterectomy is the most common non-obstetrical surgery for women in the United States. Few investigations comparing hysterectomy surgical approaches include patient-centered outcomes.

methodsThe study was performed at Henry Ford Health System in Detroit, Michigan between February 2015 and May 2015. The data were collected through structured focus groups with 24 post-hysterectomy women in order to identify PCOs to employ in a subsequent cohort study of hysterectomy surgical approaches. One pilot focus group and five additional focus groups were held. Qualitative data analysis, using data from coded transcripts of focus groups, was used to identify themes.Eligible women, aged between 18 and 65 years and had an EMR documented Current Procedural Terminology (CPT™) code or an International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems - Ninth Edition (ICD-9) code of hysterectomy between December 2012 and December 2014 (N=1,381, N=307 after exclusions) were selected and recruited. A question guide was developed to investigate women's experiences and feelings about the experience prior and subsequent to their hysterectomy. Analysis utilized the Framework Method.

resultsFocus groups with women who previously had a hysterectomy revealed their pre- and post-hysterectomy perceptions. Responses grouped into topics of pre- and post-surgical experiences, and information all women should know. Responses grouped into themes of 1) decision making, 2) the procedure - surgical experience, 3) recovery, 4) advice to past self, and 5) recommendations to other women.

conclusionThese findings about perceptions, beliefs, and attitudes of women having undergone hysterectomy could support health care providers deliver patient-centered care. These results informed data collection for a prospective longitudinal cohort study that is now underway. The data suggest a need for increased education and empowerment in the decision making process, while expanding on information given for post-operative expectations and somatic changes that occur post-hysterectomy.

Identifiers

PMID29774227
PMCPMC5953196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.