ArticleBioscience reports2018
Comparative proteomic analysis reveals the regulatory network of the
Article in Bioscience reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Morphological variation and expressed sequence tags-simple sequence repeats-based genetic diversity ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Article
- The LAMMER Kinase, LkhA, AffectsFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021Article
- Developmental transcriptomics of Chinese cordyceps reveals gene regulatory network and expression profiles of sexual development-related genes.BMC genomics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Expression of concern · 2021-03-31Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Updated to Retraction · · see also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/0E1B1FE238DDBB36E17C7154098FD9
- Retraction · 2021-04-27Concerns/Issues about Image · Manipulation of Images · Results Not Reproducible · Upgrade/Update of Prior Notice(s) · · see also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/0E1B1FE238DDBB36E17C7154098FD9
- Expression of concern
- Retracted
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.