Creating space for quality improvement.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Psychiatrists' experiences with the implementation of safewards and other quality improvement work: an explorative, qualitative interview study.BMC psychiatry · 2025
   Article
2. Physician participation in quality improvement work- interest and opportunity: a cross-sectional survey.BMC primary care · 2022
   Article
3. The Evaluation of an Interprofessional QI Program: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
   Article
4. How to improve care across boundaries.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2020
   Article
5. Rethinking collaboration: developing a learning platform to address under-five mortality in Mpumalanga province, South Africa.Health policy and planning · 2019
   Article
6. How organisations contribute to improving the quality of healthcare.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2019
   Article
7. "Change is what can actually make the tough times better": A patient-centred patient safety intervention delivered in collaboration with hospital volunteers.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019
   Article
8. Occupational Category and Professional Title Influencing the Knowledge, Attitudes and Practice (KAP) of Quality Training: A Cross-Sectional Survey From a Tertiary General Hospital.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Everyone should be encouraged to engage with quality improvement.2018
• Commented on by
  Motivated junior doctors pursue quality improvement projects.2018
• Commented on by
  Students are underused and undervalued in quality improvement.2018

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as