Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29773480›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of emergency medicine2018

Must I Respond if My Health is at Risk?

Kenneth V Iserson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of emergency medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Emergency physician risk of occupational mortality: A scoping review.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Ethical and Legal Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Are We Thinking About Rural Hospitals?The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2021
    Article
  5. Pandemic: Radiologists' Ethical and Professional Responsibilities.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2020
    Article
  6. Healthcare Ethics During a Pandemic.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2020
    Article
  7. COVID-19 Pandemic- Ethical Challenges for Healthcare Workers Practicing in Resource-Limited Settings.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kenneth V IsersonInternational Federation for Emergency Medicine and Department of Emergency Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWidespread epidemics, pandemics, and other risk-prone disasters occur with disturbing regularity. When such events occur, how should, and will, clinicians respond? The moral backbone of medical professionals-a duty to put the needs of patients first-may be sorely tested. DISCUSSION: It is incumbent on health care professionals to ask what we must do and what we should do if a dangerous health care situation threatens both ourselves and our community. Despite numerous medical ethical codes, nothing-either morally or legally-requires a response to risk-prone situations from civilian clinicians; it remains a personal decision. The most important questions are: What will encourage us to respond to these situations? And will we respond? These questions are necessary, not only for physicians and other direct health care providers, but also for vital health care system support personnel. Those who provide care in the face of perceived risk demonstrate heroic bravery, but the choice to do so has varied throughout history. To improve individual response rates, disaster planners and managers must communicate the risks clearly to all members of the health care system and help mitigate their risks by providing them with as much support and security as possible.

conclusionsThe decision to remain in or to leave a risky health care situation will ultimately depend on the provider's own risk assessment and value system. If history is any guide, we can rest assured that most clinicians will choose to stay, following the heroic example established through the centuries and continuing today.

Indexed as

Ethics, MedicalPandemicsRisk-TakingHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-ProfessionalPhysiciansassessmentbioethicscodes of ethicsdisaster planningdisastersemergency physiciansethicshealth personnelmedicalpandemicsrisk

Identifiers

PMID29773480
PMCPMC7134772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.