Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29772608›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports2018

Activity behaviors in lean and morbidly obese pregnant women.

C Fazzi, N Mohd-Shukri, F C Denison, D H Saunders, J E Norman, R M Reynolds

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Accelerometry does not measure energy expenditure.Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

C FazziTommy's Centre for Maternal and Fetal Health, MRC/University of Edinburgh, Centre for Reproductive Health, Queen's Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1820-9577
N Mohd-ShukriDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, Kulliyyah of Allied Health Sciences, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
F C DenisonTommy's Centre for Maternal and Fetal Health, MRC/University of Edinburgh, Centre for Reproductive Health, Queen's Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, UK.
D H SaundersPhysical Activity for Health Research Centre (PAHRC), Institute for Sport, Physical Education and Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
J E NormanTommy's Centre for Maternal and Fetal Health, MRC/University of Edinburgh, Centre for Reproductive Health, Queen's Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, UK.
R M ReynoldsTommy's Centre for Maternal and Fetal Health, MRC/University of Edinburgh, Centre for Reproductive Health, Queen's Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, UK.
MRC Centre for Reproductive Health · GBInstitute of Occupational Medicine · GBInternational Islamic University Malaysia · MY

Funding

Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaTommy's and the Medical Research Council MR/N022556/1Universidad Metropolitana de Ciencias de la Educacion
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interventions to increase physical activity in pregnancy are challenging for morbidly obese women. Targeting sedentary behaviors may be a suitable alternative to increase energy expenditure. We aimed to determine total energy expenditure, and energy expended in sedentary activities in morbidly obese and lean pregnant women. We administered the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (nonobjective) and the Actical accelerometer (objective) to morbidly obese (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m²) and lean (BMI ≤ 25 Kg/m²) pregnant women recruited in early (<24 weeks), and late (≥24 weeks) gestation. Data are mean (SD). Morbidly obese pregnant women reported expending significantly more energy per day in early (n = 140 vs 109; 3198.4 (1847.1) vs 1972.3 (10284.8) Kcal/d, P < .0001) and late (n = 104 vs 64; 3078.2 (1356.5) vs 1947.5 (652.0) Kcal/d, P < .0001) pregnancy, and expended significantly more energy in sedentary activities, in early (816.1 (423.5) vs 540.1 (244.9) Kcal/d, P < .0001) and late (881.6 (455.4) vs 581.1 (248.5) Kcal/d, P < .0001) pregnancy, than lean pregnant women. No differences were observed in the proportion of energy expended sedentary between lean and morbidly obese pregnant women. The greater total energy expenditure in morbidly obese pregnant women was corroborated by Actical accelerometer in early (n = 14 per group, obese 1167.7 (313.6) Kcal; lean 781.1 (210.1) Kcal, P < .05), and in late (n = 14 per group, obese 1223.6 (351.5) Kcal; lean 893.7 (175.9) Kcal, P < .05) pregnancy. In conclusion, non-objective and objective measures showed morbidly obese pregnant women expended more energy per day than lean pregnant. Further studies are needed to determine whether sedentary behaviors are a suitable target for intervention in morbidly obese pregnancy.

Indexed as

Body CompositionBody Mass IndexEnergy MetabolismExerciseCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansObesity, MorbidOligopeptidesPregnancySurveys and Questionnairescrosstide peptideOligopeptidesenergy expenditureleanmorbidly obesepregnancy

Identifiers

PMID29772608
OpenAlexW2804029838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.