Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29772185›Full record

ReviewExpert review of neurotherapeutics2018

Therapies for mobility disability in persons with multiple sclerosis.

Jessica F Baird, Brian M Sandroff, Robert W Motl

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of neurotherapeutics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment of limb spasticity following multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jessica F Bairda Department of Physical Therapy , University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham , AL , USA.
Brian M Sandroffa Department of Physical Therapy , University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham , AL , USA.
Robert W Motla Department of Physical Therapy , University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham , AL , USA.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Rehabilitation Research Resource to Enhance Clinical Trials (ReACT)P2CHD086851 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI BAMMAN, MARCAS M · 2015 to 2019
$7.1M
Interdisciplinary Training in Pathobiology and Rehabilitation Medicine.T32HD071866 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI JAMES RIMMER, Anna E. Thalacker-Mercer · 2012 to 2026
$4.8M
The essentiality of serine and glycine for skeletal muscle regeneration in agingR01AG075059 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI THALACKER-MERCER, ANNA E. · 2022 to 2025
$1.5M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG075059NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD086851NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD071866
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMobility disability is one of the most widespread and impactful consequences of multiple sclerosis (MS). Disease modifying drugs (DMDs) may delay the progression of disability over time; however, there is minimal evidence supporting the efficacy of DMDs for reversing mobility disability or restoring ambulatory function in persons with MS. Areas covered: This review outlines symptomatic pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic therapeutic approaches that target mobility disability with the goal of restoring and improving walking function. First, the efficacy of dalfampridine, currently the only Food and Drug Administration approved symptomatic pharmacologic agent that improves walking in persons with MS is described. Next, a review of the efficacy of non-pharmacologic therapies for improving walking, including exercise training, physical therapy, and gait training is given. Last, guidance on future research on mobility in MS is provided by emphasizing the importance of combinatory treatment approaches that include multiple intervention modalities, as the best treatment plan likely involves a comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach. Expert commentary: There has been an increased effort to develop symptom-specific treatments in MS that directly target mobility disability; however, more research is needed to determine the efficacy of these rehabilitative strategies alone and together for improving walking in persons with MS.

Indexed as

Mobility LimitationWalking4-AminopyridineExercise TherapyHumansMultiple SclerosisPotassium Channel Blockers4-AminopyridinePotassium Channel BlockersDalfampridineexercise traininggait trainingmobility disabilitymultiple sclerosisphysical therapywalking

Identifiers

PMID29772185
PMCPMC6291756
OpenAlexW2803267071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.