Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29772027›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Association between different combination of measures for obesity and new-onset gallstone disease.

Tong Liu, Wanchao Wang, Yannan Ji, Yiming Wang, Xining Liu, Liying Cao, Siqing Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. [New Progress in Longitudinal Research on the Risk Factors for Cholelithiasis].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Obesity and Gallstones.Visceral medicine · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tong LiuGraduate school, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, China.
Wanchao WangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Kailuan General Hospital Affiliated to North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, China.
Yannan JiSchool of Basic Medicine, Chende Medical University, Chende, China.
Yiming WangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Kailuan General Hospital Affiliated to North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, China.
Xining LiuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Kailuan General Hospital Affiliated to North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, China.
Liying CaoDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Kailuan General Hospital Affiliated to North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, China.
Siqing LiuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Kailuan General Hospital Affiliated to North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8745-0490

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBody mass index(BMI) is a calculation index of general obesity. Waist circumference(WC) is a measure of body-fat distribution and always used to estimate abdominal obesity. An important trait of general obesity and abdominal obesity is their propensity to coexist. Using one single measure of obesity could not estimate persons at risk for GSD precisely.

objectivesThis study aimed to compare the predictive values of various combination of measures for obesity(BMI, WC, waist to hip ratio) for new-onset GSD.

methodsWe prospectively studied the predictive values of various combination of measures for obesity for new-onset GSD in a cohort of 88,947 participants who were free of prior gallstone disease, demographic characteristics and biochemical parameters were recorded.

results4,329 participants were identified to have GSD among 88,947 participants during 713 345 person-years of follow-up. Higher BMI, WC and waist to hip ratio (WHtR) were significantly associated with higher risks of GSD in both genders even after adjustment for potential confounders. In males, the hazard ratio for the highest versus lowest BMI, WC, WHtR were 1.63(1.47~1.79), 1.53(1.40~1.68), 1.44(1.31~1.58), respectively. In females, the hazard ratio for the highest versus lowest BMI, WC, WHtR were 2.11(1.79~2.49), 1.85(1.55~2.22), 1.84(1.55~2.19), respectively. In male group, the combination of BMI+WC improved the predictive ability of the model more clearly than other combinations after adding them to the multivariate model in turn, while for females the best predictive combination was BMI+WHtR.

conclusionsElevated BMI, WC and WHtR were independent risk factors for new-onset GSD in both sex groups after additional adjustment was made for potential confounders. In males, the combination of BMI+WC seemed to be the most predictable model to evaluate the effect of obesity on new-onset GSD, while the best combination in females was BMI+WHtR.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBody Mass IndexChinaCohort StudiesFemaleGallstonesHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesityObesity, AbdominalProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID29772027
PMCPMC5957348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.