Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29771779›Full record

ArticleJournal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)2018

Cost of Integrating Noncommunicable Disease Screening Into Home-Based HIV Testing and Counseling in South Africa.

Ilya Golovaty, Monisha Sharma, Alastair Van Heerden, Heidi van Rooyen, Jared M Baeten, Connie Celum, Ruanne V Barnabas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ilya GolovatyDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
Monisha SharmaDepartments of Global Health and Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Alastair Van HeerdenDepartment of Human and Social Development, Human Sciences Research Council, South Africa.
Heidi van RooyenDepartment of Human and Social Development, Human Sciences Research Council, South Africa.
Jared M BaetenDepartments of Global Health and Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Connie CelumDepartments of Global Health and Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Ruanne V BarnabasDepartments of Global Health and Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

Funding

University of Washington/Fred Hutch Center for AIDS ResearchP30AI027757 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Kenneth Sherr · 1988 to 2026
$104.9M
Interventions to decrease HIV infectiousness in UgandaRC4AI092552 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CELUM, CONNIE L · 2010 to 2013
$5.6M
Multi-component, Targeted HIV Prevention for sub-Saharan Africa: PreventionRxR01AI083034 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CELUM, CONNIE L · 2009 to 2012
$4.3M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027757NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI083034NIAID NIH HHS RC4 AI092552
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIntegrated HIV-noncommunicable disease (NCD) services have the potential to avert death and disability but require data on program costs to assess the impact of integrated services on affordability.

methodsWe estimated the incremental costs of NCD screening as part of home-based HIV testing and counseling (HTC) and referral to care in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. All adults in the households were offered integrated HIV-NCD screening (for HIV, diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, obesity, depression, tobacco, and alcohol use), counseling, and linkage to care. We conducted comprehensive program microcosting including ingredient-based and activity-based costing, staff interviews, and time assessment studies. Sensitivity analyses varied cost inputs and screening efficiency.

resultsIntegrating all-inclusive NCD screening as part of home-based HTC in a high HIV prevalence setting increased program costs by $3.95 (42%) per person screened (from $9.36 to $13.31 per person). Integrated NCD screening, excluding point-of-care cholesterol testing, increased program costs by $2.24 (24%). Furthermore, NCD screening integrated into HTC services reduced the number of persons tested by 15%-20% per day.

conclusionsIntegrated HIV-NCD screening has the potential to efficiently use resources compared with stand-alone services. Although all-inclusive NCD screening could increase the incremental cost per person screened for integrated HIV-NCD services over 40%, a less costly lipid assay or targeted screening would result in a modest increase in costs with the potential to avert NCD death and disability. Our analysis highlights the need for implementation science studies to estimate the cost-effectiveness of integrated HIV-NCD screening and linkage per disability-adjusted life year and death averted.

Indexed as

AIDS SerodiagnosisCosts and Cost AnalysisCounselingNoncommunicable DiseasesAdultChronic DiseaseCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesHIV InfectionsHIV SeroprevalenceHome Care ServicesHumansMass ScreeningSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID29771779
PMCPMC6037552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.