Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29771601›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2018

Response to third rubella vaccine dose.

Lotta Siira, Hanne Nøkleby, Regine Barlinn, Øystein R Riise, Ingeborg S Aaberge, Susanne G Dudman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Lotta Siiraa Division for Infection Control and Environmental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH) , Oslo , Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-0330-7396
Hanne Nøklebya Division for Infection Control and Environmental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH) , Oslo , Norway.
Regine Barlinna Division for Infection Control and Environmental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH) , Oslo , Norway.
Øystein R Riisea Division for Infection Control and Environmental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH) , Oslo , Norway.
Ingeborg S Aabergea Division for Infection Control and Environmental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH) , Oslo , Norway.
Susanne G Dudmana Division for Infection Control and Environmental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH) , Oslo , Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5047-4982
Norwegian Institute of Public Health · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Limited data exist on the immunogenicity of a third dose of the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (MMR). In this study, our aim was to evaluate the long-term rubella immunogenicity afforded by two childhood MMR doses of the Norwegian vaccination program in a cohort of conscripts and to determine the effect of an additional dose of MMR vaccine, in order to inform vaccination policy. Blood samples from Norwegian conscripts (n = 495) taken both before and eight months after administration of a dose of MMR vaccine were tested using an enzyme immunoassay to measure anti-rubella IgG. Concentrations <5 IU/mL were regarded as negative, 5.0-9.9 IU/mL as equivocal, and ≥10 IU/mL as positive. Overall, the seropositivity before vaccination was 84.6%, and 99.0% of the conscripts had anti-rubella IgG concentrations ≥5 IU/mL. The seropositivity after vaccination was 94.5%, and 99.8% of the conscripts had antibody concentrations ≥5 IU/mL. The geometrical mean IgG concentrations increased from 21.4 IU/mL before vaccination to 28.9 IU/mL after. Four out of five conscripts, with seronegative concentrations before administrations of an additional MMR dose, had equivocal or seropositive results following vaccination. The cohort of young adults in Norway, which was eligible for two childhood MMR doses, was protected against rubella, and efforts should be made to maintain high vaccine coverage to ensure immunity in the future. A third dose of MMR administered in early adulthood led to an increase in the antibody concentration in our cohort and seroconversion for the majority of seronegative persons.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntibodies, ViralChildCohort StudiesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansImmunization ScheduleImmunization, SecondaryImmunoglobulin GMaleMeasles-Mumps-Rubella VaccineNorwayRubellaYoung AdultAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin GMeasles-Mumps-Rubella VaccineMMRrubellaseroprevalencevaccination

Identifiers

PMID29771601
PMCPMC6284511
OpenAlexW2803539410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.