Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29771231›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2018

Food choice motives, attitude towards and intention to adopt personalised nutrition.

Audrey Rankin, Brendan P Bunting, Rui Poínhos, Ivo A van der Lans, Arnout Rh Fischer, Sharron Kuznesof, Mdv Almeida, Jerko Markovina, Lynn J Frewer, Barbara J Stewart-Knox

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Factors associated with food choice among long-term weight loss maintainers.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Audrey Rankin1School of Pharmacy,Queens University Belfast,Belfast,UK.
Brendan P Bunting2Psychology Research Institute,Ulster University,Belfast,UK.
Rui Poínhos3Faculty of Nutrition and Food Sciences,University of Porto,Porto,Portugal.
Ivo A van der Lans4Marketing and Consumer Behaviour Group,Wageningen University,Wageningen,The Netherlands.
Arnout Rh Fischer4Marketing and Consumer Behaviour Group,Wageningen University,Wageningen,The Netherlands.
Sharron Kuznesof5School of Agriculture, Food and Rural Development,Newcastle University,Newcastle upon Tyne,UK.
Mdv Almeida3Faculty of Nutrition and Food Sciences,University of Porto,Porto,Portugal.
Jerko Markovina6Division of Psychology,University of Bradford,Richmond Road, Bradford,West Yorkshire,BD7 1DP,UK.
Lynn J Frewer5School of Agriculture, Food and Rural Development,Newcastle University,Newcastle upon Tyne,UK.
Barbara J Stewart-Knox6Division of Psychology,University of Bradford,Richmond Road, Bradford,West Yorkshire,BD7 1DP,UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe present study explored associations between food choice motives, attitudes towards and intention to adopt personalised nutrition, to inform communication strategies based on consumer priorities and concerns.Design/SettingA survey was administered online which included the Food Choice Questionnaire (FCQ) and items assessing attitudes towards and intention to adopt personalised nutrition. SUBJECTS: Nationally representative samples were recruited in nine EU countries (n 9381).

resultsStructural equation modelling indicated that the food choice motives 'weight control', 'mood', 'health' and 'ethical concern' had a positive association and 'price' had a negative association with attitude towards, and intention to adopt, personalised nutrition. 'Health' was positively associated and 'familiarity' negatively associated with attitude towards personalised nutrition. The effects of 'weight control', 'ethical concern', 'mood' and 'price' on intention to adopt personalised nutrition were partially mediated by attitude. The effects of 'health' and 'familiarity' were fully mediated by attitude. 'Sensory appeal' was negatively and directly associated with intention to adopt personalised nutrition.

conclusionsPersonalised nutrition providers may benefit from taking into consideration the importance of underlying determinants of food choice in potential users, particularly weight control, mood and price, when promoting services and in tailoring communications that are motivationally relevant.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthFood PreferencesIntentionMotivationAdolescentAdultAgedDiet, HealthyEuropean UnionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesAttitudesFood4MeFood choice motivesFood Choices QuestionnaireIntentionNutrigenomicsPersonalised nutritionSurvey

Identifiers

PMID29771231
PMCPMC10260806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.