ReviewInsights into imaging2018
A review of existing and potential computer user interfaces for modern radiology.
Review in Insights into imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D Printing Applications and Extended Realities in Medicine: Systematic Review.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2026Article
- FireVoxel: Interactive Software for Multi-Modality Analysis of Dynamic Medical Images.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Review
- Exploring interaction paradigms for segmenting medical images in virtual reality.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025Article
- Assessing oral surgery residents' competencies and training needs in tomography interfaces through a usability framework.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- XR (Extended Reality: Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, Mixed Reality) Technology in Spine Medicine: Status Quo and Quo Vadis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Interventional Radiology ex-machina: impact of Artificial Intelligence on practice.La Radiologia medica · 2021Review
- Intra-operative 3D hologram support with mixed reality technique based on CT-MRI fusion images: operation guidance for brain brachytherapy.Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2021Article
- 3D Printing Applications for Radiology: An Overview.The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2021Review
- Holographic image-guided thoracoscopic surgery: possibility of usefulness for esophageal cancer patients with abnormal artery.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2020Article
- Myths and facts about artificial intelligence: why machine- and deep-learning will not replace interventional radiologists.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2020Review
- Eye Tracking for Deep Learning Segmentation Using Convolutional Neural Networks.Journal of digital imaging · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The digitalization of modern imaging has led radiologists to become very familiar with computers and their user interfaces (UI). New options for display and command offer expanded possibilities, but the mouse and keyboard remain the most commonly utilized, for usability reasons. In this work, we review and discuss different UI and their possible application in radiology. We consider two-dimensional and three-dimensional imaging displays in the context of interventional radiology, and discuss interest in touchscreens, kinetic sensors, eye detection, and augmented or virtual reality. We show that UI design specifically for radiologists is key for future use and adoption of such new interfaces. Next-generation UI must fulfil professional needs, while considering contextual constraints. TEACHING POINTS: • The mouse and keyboard remain the most utilized user interfaces for radiologists. • Touchscreen, holographic, kinetic sensors and eye tracking offer new possibilities for interaction. • 3D and 2D imaging require specific user interfaces. • Holographic display and augmented reality provide a third dimension to volume imaging. • Good usability is essential for adoption of new user interfaces by radiologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.