Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29770922›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2019

Application of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery: an Italian survey.

Giovanni Capretti, Ugo Boggi, Roberto Salvia, Giulio Belli, Roberto Coppola, Massimo Falconi, Andrea Valeri, Alessandro Zerbi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A worldwide survey on proctological practice during COVID-19 lockdown (ProctoLock 2020): a cross-sectional analysis.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Giovanni CaprettiHumanitas University, Rozzano, MI, Italy.
Ugo BoggiUniversità di Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Roberto SalviaUniversità di Verona, Verona, Italy.
Giulio BelliOspedale Loreto Mare, Naples, Italy.
Roberto CoppolaCampus Biomedico, Rome, Italy.
Massimo FalconiUniversità Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Andrea ValeriOspedale Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Alessandro ZerbiHumanitas University, Rozzano, MI, Italy. alessandro.zerbi@hunimed.eu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The value of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery (MIPS) is still debated. To assess the diffusion of MIPS in Italy and identify the barriers preventing wider implementation, a questionnaire was developed under the auspices of three Scientific Societies (AISP, It-IHPBA, SICE) and was sent to the largest possible number of Italian surgeons also using the mailing list of the two main Italian Surgical Societies (SIC and ACOI). The questionnaire consisted of 25 questions assessing: centre characteristics, facilities and technologies, type of MIPS performed, surgical techniques employed and opinions on the present and future value of MIPS. Only one reply per unit was considered. Fifty-five units answered the questionnaire. While 54 units (98.2%) declared to perform MIPS, the majority of responders were not dedicated to pancreatic surgery. Twenty-five units (45.5%) performed < 20 pancreatic resections/year and 39 (70.9%) < 10 MIPS per year. Forty-nine units (89.1%) performed at least one minimally invasive (MI) distal pancreatectomy (DP), and 10 (18.2%) at least one MI pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Robotic assistance was used in 18 units (31.7%) (14 DP, 7 PD). The major constraints limiting the diffusion of MIPS were the intrinsic difficulty of the technique and the lack of specific training. The overall value of MIPS was highly rated. Our survey illustrates the current diffusion of MIPS in Italy and underlines the great interest for this approach. Further diffusion of MIPS requires the implementation of standardized protocols of training. Creation of a prospective National Registry should also be considered.

Indexed as

SurgeonsSurveys and QuestionnairesGeneral SurgeryHumansItalyLaparoscopyMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPancreasPancreatectomyPancreaticoduodenectomyProcedures and Techniques UtilizationRobotic Surgical ProceduresSocieties, MedicalItalyLaparoscopyMinimally invasive surgeryPancreatic surgeryRobotic surgerySurvey

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.