ArticleJournal of gynecologic oncology2018
Minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer: consequences for treatment after LACC Study.
Article in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quality of life in patients with cervical cancer after open versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (LACC): a secondary outcome of a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.The Lancet. Oncology · 2020Trial
- A Minimally Invasive Treatment Approach for Early-Stage Uterine Cervical Cancer: The Impact of the LACC Trial and a Literature Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: current trends and controversies.Journal of Cancer · 2024Review
- Retrospective Comparison of Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer in a Single Tertiary Care Institution from Lithuania between 2009 and 2019.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- Long non-coding RNAs PGM5-AS1 upregulates Decorin (DCN) to inhibit cervical cancer progression by sponging miR-4284.Bioengineered · 2022Article
- Operating costs, fiscal impact, value analysis and guidance for the routine use of robotic technology in abdominal surgical procedures.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Retrospective Analysis of Cervical Cancer Treatment Outcomes: Ten Years of Experience with the Vaginal Assisted Radical Laparoscopic Hysterectomy VARLH.BioMed research international · 2022Observational
- Effect of Quality Control Program in Surgical Management of Early Cervical Cancer.Journal of Korean medical science · 2021Article
- Impact of surgeon learning curve in minimally invasive radical hysterectomy on early stage cervical cancer patient survival.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2021Article
- Lymph-Vascular Space Invasion in Patients with Stages IA2-IIA2 Cervical Cancer Treated with Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Hysterectomy.Cancer management and research · 2021Article
- The Landmark Series: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Cervical Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2021Article
- The current status of laparoscopic and robotic para-aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic cancer surgery.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2021Article
- Article
- The role of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: ESGE-SERGS position document and joint-statement.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2020Article
- [Minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer : Consequences of the LACC study].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2020Article
- Surgical Management of Early Cervical Cancer: When Is Laparoscopic Appropriate?Current oncology reports · 2020Review
- A Comparison of Laparoscopies and Laparotomies for Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA1-IB1 Cervical Cancer Patients: A Single Team With 18 Years of Experience.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- Ultrasound Microbubble-Mediated microRNA-505 Regulates Cervical Cancer Cell Growth via AKT2.Analytical cellular pathology (Amsterdam) · 2020Article
- The 34th Annual Meeting of the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2019: meeting report.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2019Article
- Comparative Effectiveness of Abdominal versus Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer in the Postdissemination Era.Cancer research and treatment · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.