Unexpected result of minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Long-Term Oncological Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Surgery in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.Cancers · 2025
   Article
2. Vaginal Tumor Cell Exfoliation in Cervical and Endometrial Cancer: A Comparative Washing Cytology Study with Implications for Minimally Invasive Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
   Article
3. The sealing effect of magnetic-sealing uterine manipulator in isolated uterus from patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a pre-clinical study.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2023
   Article
4. Transvaginal cervical tumor-concealing no-look no-touch technique in minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a novel operation technique.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2023
   Article
5. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer stage IB1.International journal of medical sciences · 2023
   Article
6. Is there a relationship between surgical proficiency and oncologic outcome of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer?International journal of medical sciences · 2023
   Article
7. Retrospective Comparison of Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer in a Single Tertiary Care Institution from Lithuania between 2009 and 2019.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022
   Article
8. Feasibility and Outcomes of "No-Look No-Touch" Laparoscopic Radical Trachelectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
   Article
9. Effect of multimodal analgesia on gynecological cancer patients after radical resection.American journal of translational research · 2021
   Article
10. Comparison of abdominal and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer.International journal of medical sciences · 2021
    Article
11. Survival rates of patients who undergo minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer with cervical involvement.International journal of medical sciences · 2021
    Article
12. Twenty-first century radical hysterectomy - Journey from descriptive to practical anatomy.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2020
    Review
13. Letter to the Editor concerning "Thoracolumbar corpectomy/spondylectomy for spinal metastasis: a pooled analysis comparing the outcome of seven different surgical approaches" by Spiessberger A, Arvind V, Gruter B, Cho SK [Eur Spine J (2019): doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06179-8].European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Article
14. A Comparison of Laparoscopies and Laparotomies for Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA1-IB1 Cervical Cancer Patients: A Single Team With 18 Years of Experience.Frontiers in oncology · 2020
    Article
15. Comparative Effectiveness of Abdominal versus Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer in the Postdissemination Era.Cancer research and treatment · 2019
    Article
16. Major clinical research advances in gynecologic cancer in 2018.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2019
    Review
17. Rethinking the next step after unexpected results associated with minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2019
    Article
18. The Impaction of Laparoscopic versus Laparotomy for Lymphovascular Space Invasion of Early Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapy
    Article
19. Cervical Cancer Surgery: Current State of Affairs.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapy
    Review

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Rethinking the next step after unexpected results associated with minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer.2019

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as