Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29770626›Full record

GuidelineJournal of gynecologic oncology2018

Practice guidelines for management of ovarian cancer in Korea: a Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology Consensus Statement.

Dong Hoon Suh, Suk Joon Chang, Taejong Song, Sanghoon Lee, Woo Dae Kang, Sun Joo Lee, Ju Won Roh, Won Duk Joo, Joo Hee Yoon, Dae Hoon Jeong and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04678102 (A Phase I, Open-label, Dose-finding Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of PHI-101 in Patients With Platinum-Resistance/Refractory Ovarian Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04678102 phase1unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

A Phase I, Open-label, Dose-finding Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of PHI-101 in Patients With Platinum-Resistance/Refractory Ovarian Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorSeoul National University HospitalRan2020 to 2023Enrolled36ConditionsPlatinum-resistant Ovarian Cancer, Platinum-refractory Ovarian Carcinoma, Platinum-Resistant Fallopian Tube Carcinoma, Platinum-Resistant Primary Peritoneal CarcinomaArmsPHI-101 administration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Outcome quality standards in advanced ovarian cancer surgery.World journal of surgical oncology · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Dong Hoon SuhDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4312-966X
Suk Joon ChangGynecologic Cancer Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea. drchang@ajou.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0558-0038
Taejong SongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0288-1254
Sanghoon LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Woo Dae KangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3952-9724
Sun Joo LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ju Won RohDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2449-8742
Won Duk JooDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4637-6946
Joo Hee YoonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Dae Hoon JeongBusan Paik Hospital, Paik Institute for Clinical Research, Inje University, Busan, Korea.
Hee Seung KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6876-8671
Sung Jong LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6077-2649
Yong Il JiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1030-6105
Hyun Jung KimDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2018-2385
Jeong Won LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6945-0398
Jae Weon KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1835-9436
Duk Soo BaeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0016-1704

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since after 2006 when the first edition of practice guidelines for gynecologic oncologic cancer treatment was released, the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology (KSGO) has published the following editions on a regular basis to suggest the best possible standard care considering updated scientific evidence as well as medical environment including insurance coverage. The Guidelines Revision Committee was summoned to revise the second edition of KSGO practice guidelines, which was published in July 2010, and develop the third edition. The current guidelines cover strategies for diagnosis and treatment of primary and recurrent ovarian cancer. In this edition, we introduced an advanced format based on evidence-based medicine, collecting up-to-date data mainly from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library CENTRAL, and conducting a meta-analysis with systematic review. Eight key questions were raised by the committee members. For every key question, recommendations were developed by the consensus meetings and provided with evidence level and strength of the recommendation.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialConsensusNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOvarian NeoplasmsEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleGynecologyHumansNeoplasm StagingRepublic of KoreaSocieties, MedicalConsensusDrug TherapyGeneral SurgeryOvarian NeoplasmsPractice Guideline

Identifiers

PMID29770626
PMCPMC5981107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.