Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29770618›Full record

Observational studyJournal of gynecologic oncology2018

Peritoneal cancer index as a predictor of survival in advanced stage serous epithelial ovarian cancer: a prospective study.

Alaa A Elzarkaa, Waleed Shaalan, Doaa Elemam, Hassan Mansour, Mahmoud Melis, Eduard Malik, Amr A Soliman

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Survival outcome and perioperative complication related to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel for advanced ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology · 2020
    Pooled it
  7. Value of anQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Proposed Nodal Cancer Index (NCI) in ovarian carcinomatosis.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alaa A ElzarkaaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2796-6772
Waleed ShaalanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2576-2269
Doaa ElemamDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Mansura, Mansura, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4857-2668
Hassan MansourDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3908-0848
Mahmoud MelisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3125-1270
Eduard MalikDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Women's Hospital, Klinikum Oldenburg, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0731-6150
Amr A SolimanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Women's Hospital, Klinikum Oldenburg, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany. amr.soliman@uni-oldenburg.de, soliman.amr@klinikum-oldenburg.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1495-5508

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA numerical score, the peritoneal cancer index (PCI), was developed to reflect the extent of tumor growth in gastric and colorectal cancers and to tailor treatment. This study aimed to examine the value of the PCI score in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) regarding completeness of surgical cytoreduction and survival.

methodsThis was a prospective observational cohort study. Patients with primary serous EOC at International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages IIIB or higher were included. Patients with FIGO stage IVB as well as those assigned to receive neoadjuvant treatment were excluded from the study. The PCI was obtained and registered intraoperatively.

resultsIn the study period we recruited 96 patients with serous EOC stage IIIB-IVA. A PCI score cut-off value of 13 was calculated using a receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve, above which worse survival is expected (area under the curve [AUC]=0.641; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.517-0.765; sensitivity and specificity 80.6%, 45.0%, respectively; p=0.050). A multivariate analysis determined that suboptimal surgical cytoreduction was the only independent predictive factor for recurrence (odds ratio [OR]=7.548; 95% CI=1.473-38.675; p=0.015). A multivariate analysis determined that only suboptimal surgical cytoreduction (hazard ratio [HR]=2.33; 95% CI=0.616-8.795; p=0.005), but not PCI score >13 (HR=1.289; 95% CI=0.329-5.046; p=0.716), was an independent predictive factor for death.

conclusionWe conclude from this study that the PCI score is a reliable tool helping to assess the extent of disease in advanced serous EOC patients and may help predicting complete surgical cytoreduction but cannot qualify as a predictor of survival.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingOvarian NeoplasmsPeritoneal NeoplasmsPredictive Value of TestsProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesROC CurveCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresEpithelial Ovarian CancerProspective StudySurvival

Identifiers

PMID29770618
PMCPMC5981099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.