Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29770531›Full record

ArticleWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society2018

Use of antibiotic impregnated resorbable beads reduces pressure ulcer recurrence: A retrospective analysis.

Ibrahim Khansa, Jenny C Barker, Piya Das Ghatak, Chandan K Sen, Gayle M Gordillo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ibrahim KhansaDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Jenny C BarkerDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Piya Das GhatakDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Chandan K SenDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Gayle M GordilloDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

Wound Healing Endpoint and RecurrenceR01NR015676 · NINR · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GORDILLO, GAYLE M, ROY, SASHWATI · 2015 to 2019
$2.6M
Biofilms and Immunity in Chronic WoundsR01NR013898 · NINR · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SEN, CHANDAN K, WOZNIAK, DANIEL J · 2012 to 2016
$2.1M
NIH HHS NR013898NIH HHS R01 NR015676NINR NIH HHS R01 NR013898NINR NIH HHS R01 NR015676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recurrence of pressure ulcers remains common. We have employed resorbable antibiotic beads as a therapeutic strategy to deliver high local antibiotic concentrations to the debridement site. Our objective was to determine whether the use of resorbable antibiotic- beads would reduce pressure ulcer recurrence. We reviewed all stage IV pressure ulcers treated with excision, partial ostectomy and flap coverage over 16 years. Baseline patient factors (location of ulcer, presence of osteomyelitis, preoperative prealbumin), surgical factors (type of flap, use of antibiotic beads, bone culture results) and postoperative outcomes (ulcer recurrence at 1 year, dehiscence, seroma, cellulitis) were collected. Outcomes of patients who received antibiotic-impregnated beads were compared to those who did not. Eighty-six patients with 120 stage IV pressure ulcers underwent excision and flap coverage. This included 16 ulcers where antibiotic beads were used and 104 where they were not. The overall ulcer recurrence rate at 12 months was 35.8%. The recurrence rate in the group treated with antibiotic beads was significantly lower than the group without beads (12.5% vs. 39.4%, p = 0.03). Overall, complication rates between the two groups were similar (43.8% vs. 51.9%, p = 0.54). No systemic or local toxicity from antibiotic beads occurred. Scanning electron microscopy images of sacral bone from one case showed bacterial biofilm even after debridement. Pressure ulcer recurrence at 1 year after excision and flap coverage decreased significantly with the use of resorbable antibiotic beads.

Indexed as

Infusion Pumps, ImplantablePostoperative CareAnti-Bacterial AgentsDebridementHumansOsteomyelitisPlastic Surgery ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsPressure UlcerRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesSurgical FlapsTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID29770531
PMCPMC7173798
OpenAlexW2803728229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.