ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2018
One Health Integration: A Proposed Framework for a Study on Veterinarians and Zoonotic Disease Management in Ghana.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Barriers and enablers to the implementation of one health strategies in developing countries: a systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2023Pooled it
- Stakeholder identification and prioritization of barriers to One Health implementation in Ghana's zoonotic disease surveillance and response system: a sequential mixed-methods study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- One Health implementation in Ghana: a perspective on policy development and institutional change.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Ties that bind: understanding One Health networks and participation for zoonoses prevention and control in India.One health outlook · 2024Article
- Social insights on the implementation of One Health in zoonosis prevention and control: a scoping review.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2022Article
- Fighting Antimicrobial Resistance: Development and Implementation of the Ghanaian National Action Plan (2017-2021).Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Meanings and mechanisms of One Health partnerships: insights from a critical review of literature on cross-government collaborations.Health policy and planning · 2022Review
- Operationalising the "One Health" approach in India: facilitators of and barriers to effective cross-sector convergence for zoonoses prevention and control.BMC public health · 2021Article
- Practices in research, surveillance and control of neglected tropical diseases by One Health approaches: A survey targeting scientists from French-speaking countries.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2021Article
- Short report on implications of Covid-19 and emerging zoonotic infectious diseases for pastoralists and Africa.Pastoralism : research, policy and practice · 2020Article
- Is the current surge in political and financial attention to One Health solidifying or splintering the movement?BMJ global health · 2019Article
- Operationalizing One Health Employing Social-Ecological Systems Theory: Lessons From the Greater Mekong Sub-region.Frontiers in public health · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In parallel with the recent world-wide promotion of One Health (OH) as a policy concept, a growing body of social science studies has raised questions about how successful OH policies and programs have been in managing some global health issues, such as zoonotic diseases. This paper briefly reviews this literature to clarify its critical perspective. Much of the literature on OH also is focused on health management at an international level and has paid less attention to implementation programs and policies for OH at the national and local levels, especially in low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs). Programs to implement OH often are linked to the concept of "integration", a notion that lacks a universal definition, but is nonetheless a central tenet and goal in many OH programs. At the local and national levels, strong differences in perspectives about OH among different professions can be major barriers to integration of those professions into OH implementation. Policies based on integration among professions in sectors like animal, human and environmental health can threaten professions' identities and thus may meet with resistance. Taking into account these criticisms of OH research and implementation, this paper proposes a research framework to probe the dominant social dimensions and power dynamics among professional participants that affect OH implementation programs at the local and national levels in a low-income country. The proposed research focus is the veterinary profession and one aspect of OH in which veterinarians are necessary actors: zoonotic disease management. Results from research framed in this way can have immediate application to the programs under study and can inform more expansive research on the social determinants of successful implementation of OH programs and policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.