ReviewTranslational pediatrics2018
An overview of mechanical circulatory support in single-ventricle patients.
Review in Translational pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Heart and combined heart-liver transplantation in Asian patients with Fontan circulatory failure: a single-center experience.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- End-of-Life Care for Infants and Children with Single Ventricle Anatomy.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Contemporary Management of the Failing Fontan.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Palliated Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome Patients Experience Superior Waitlist and Comparable Post-Heart Transplant Survival to Non-Single Ventricle Congenital Heart Disease Patients.Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2024Article
- Narrative review of single ventricle: where are we after 40 years?Translational pediatrics · 2023Review
- Rethinking status 1A criteria in pediatric cardiac transplantation: A case for the prioritization of patients with single ventricle anatomy supported by ventricular assist devices.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- Commentary: Add a ventricular assist device? Add a stent? A tree of decisions for small univentricular hearts.JTCVS techniques · 2022Article
- Management of circulatory failure after Fontan surgery.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Review
- Current Treatment Options for the Failing Fontan Circulation.Current cardiology reviews · 2022Review
- Functional hepatic deterioration determined byFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- A Novel Method to Safely De-Air a HeartWare System in a Single-Ventricle Patient by Utilizing ECMO and a Minimized CPB Circuit.The journal of extra-corporeal technology · 2021Article
- Mechanical circulatory support in pediatric patients with biventricular and univentricular hearts.JTCVS open · 2021Article
- Morphologic Alterations Precede Functional Hepatic Impairment as Determined byFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Article
- Important Considerations in Pediatric Heart Failure.Current cardiology reports · 2020Review
- Review on Mechanical Support and Cell-Based Therapies for the Prevention and Recovery of the Failed Fontan-Kreutzer Circulation.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2020Review
- Current spectrum, challenges and new developments in the surgical care of adults with congenital heart disease.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The population of people with a single-ventricle is continually increasing due to improvements across the spectrum of medical care. Unfortunately, a proportion of these patients will develop heart failure. Often, for these patients, mechanical circulatory support (MCS) represents the only available treatment option. While single-ventricle patients currently represent a small proportion of the total number of patients who receive MCS, as the single-ventricle patient population increases, this number will increase as well. Outcomes for these complex single-ventricle patients who require MCS has begun to be evaluated. When considering the entire population, survival to hospital discharge is 30-50%, though this must be considered with the significant heterogeneity of the single-ventricle patient population. Patients with a single-ventricle have unique anatomy, mechanisms of failure, indications for MCS and the type of support utilized. This has made the interpretation and the generalizability of the limited available data difficult. It is likely that some subsets will have a significantly worse prognosis and others a better one. Unfortunately, with these limited data, indications of a favorable or poor outcome have not yet been elucidated. Though currently, a database has been constructed to address this issue. While the outcomes for these complex patients is unclear, at least in some situations, they are poor. However, significant advances may provide improvements going forward, including new devices, computer simulations and 3D printed models. The most important factor, however, will be the increased experience gained by the heart failure team to improve patient selection, timing, device and configuration selection and operative approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.