Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29770296›Full record

ReviewTranslational pediatrics2018

An overview of mechanical circulatory support in single-ventricle patients.

Jacob R Miller, Timothy S Lancaster, Connor Callahan, Aaron M Abarbanell, Pirooz Eghtesady

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Contemporary Management of the Failing Fontan.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Functional hepatic deterioration determined byFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jacob R MillerDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital/Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Timothy S LancasterDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital/Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Connor CallahanDepartment of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital/Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Aaron M AbarbanellSection of Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. Louis Children's Hospital/Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Pirooz EghtesadySection of Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. Louis Children's Hospital/Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Jewish Hospital · USSt. Louis Children's Hospital · USBarnes-Jewish Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The population of people with a single-ventricle is continually increasing due to improvements across the spectrum of medical care. Unfortunately, a proportion of these patients will develop heart failure. Often, for these patients, mechanical circulatory support (MCS) represents the only available treatment option. While single-ventricle patients currently represent a small proportion of the total number of patients who receive MCS, as the single-ventricle patient population increases, this number will increase as well. Outcomes for these complex single-ventricle patients who require MCS has begun to be evaluated. When considering the entire population, survival to hospital discharge is 30-50%, though this must be considered with the significant heterogeneity of the single-ventricle patient population. Patients with a single-ventricle have unique anatomy, mechanisms of failure, indications for MCS and the type of support utilized. This has made the interpretation and the generalizability of the limited available data difficult. It is likely that some subsets will have a significantly worse prognosis and others a better one. Unfortunately, with these limited data, indications of a favorable or poor outcome have not yet been elucidated. Though currently, a database has been constructed to address this issue. While the outcomes for these complex patients is unclear, at least in some situations, they are poor. However, significant advances may provide improvements going forward, including new devices, computer simulations and 3D printed models. The most important factor, however, will be the increased experience gained by the heart failure team to improve patient selection, timing, device and configuration selection and operative approach.

Indexed as

FontanGlennMechanical circulatory support (MCS)Norwoodreviewsingle-ventricleventricular assist device (VAD)

Identifiers

PMID29770296
PMCPMC5938256
OpenAlexW2802444458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.