Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29769992›Full record

ArticleCanada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada2016

Advancing surveillance of antimicrobial resistance: Summary of the 2015 CIDSC Report.

K Amaratunga, J Tarasuk, L Tsegaye, C P Archibald, 2015 Communicable and Infectious Disease Steering Committee (CIDSC), Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) Surveillance Task Group

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Epidemiology ofCanada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2019
    Article
  9. Emerging risk of untreatable gonorrhea and what to do about it.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2017
    Article
  10. How is an international public health threat advanced in Canada? The case of antimicrobial resistance.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K AmaratungaCentre for Communicable Diseases and Infection Control, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.
J TarasukCentre for Communicable Diseases and Infection Control, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.
L TsegayeSchulich School of Family Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON.
C P ArchibaldCentre for Communicable Diseases and Infection Control, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.
2015 Communicable and Infectious Disease Steering Committee (CIDSC)
Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) Surveillance Task Group
Public Health Agency of Canada · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntimicrobials are essential for the treatment and control of infectious diseases and therefore, the development and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global health concern. It is recognized that robust AMR surveillance is necessary; however, current gaps in national surveillance programs need to be addressed to enable better evidence-informed program and policy decisions.

objectiveTo describe how an AMR Surveillance Task Group prioritized national AMR surveillance data requirements for high priority AMR organisms for human health in Canada and made recommendations on addressing the current data gaps.

methodsThe 2015 AMR Surveillance Task Group examined the data requirements for previously identified first priority organisms and assessed whether the current system met, partially met or did not meet these requirements. Information was summarized into synopsis tables and a ranking process was used to prioritize the data requirements and develop specific recommendations to address the gaps.

resultsFirst priority organisms identified for AMR surveillance are:

conclusionWhile current national surveillance programs either capture or partially capture many of the identified data requirements for first priority organisms, several gaps still remain, especially in community settings. A national review of the recommendations of the Task Group is underway.

Identifiers

PMID29769992
PMCPMC5757739
OpenAlexW2792150909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.