Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29769904›Full record

ArticleCanada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada2014

Canadian integrated program for antimicrobial resistance surveillance: Retail food highlights, 2003-2012.

B P Avery, E J Parmley, R J Reid-Smith, D Daignault, R L Finley, R J Irwin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Advancing surveillance of antimicrobial resistance: Summary of the 2015 CIDSC Report.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2016
    Article
  7. Ciprofloxacin-resistantCanada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

B P AveryLaboratory for Foodborne Zoonoses, Public Health Agency of Canada, Guelph, ON.
E J ParmleyLaboratory for Foodborne Zoonoses, Public Health Agency of Canada, Guelph, ON.
R J Reid-SmithLaboratory for Foodborne Zoonoses, Public Health Agency of Canada, Guelph, ON.
D DaignaultLaboratory for Foodborne Zoonoses, Public Health Agency of Canada, Saint Hyacinthe, QC.
R L FinleyCentre for Food-borne, Environmental and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada, Guelph, ON.
R J IrwinLaboratory for Foodborne Zoonoses, Public Health Agency of Canada, Guelph, ON.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Canadian Integrated Program for Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance (CIPARS) is a collaborative, integrated program designed to track antimicrobial resistance (AMR) among enteric bacteria isolated from various livestock commodities along the food-producing continuum ("farm to fork") and in humans.

objectiveTo provide a summary of the prevalence and trends in AMR among select bacteria isolated from raw, fresh chicken, pork, and beef in 2012 at the retail food level and to link these data with other findings from CIPARS.

methodsMeat samples were collected from randomly selected geographic areas across Canada weighted by population for subsequent isolation of bacteria and interpretation of the associated AMR profiles.

resultsOverall, resistance levels to

conclusionIn Canada, as is the case worldwide, there is evidence of resistance to medically important antimicrobials among bacteria from retail meats. Resistance among organisms isolated from poultry, beef, and pork at the retail food level is characterized by wide variation over time and across different regions.

Identifiers

PMID29769904
PMCPMC5868548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.