Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29769813›Full record

ArticlePaediatrics & child health2018

Paediatric vision screening in the primary care setting in Ontario.

Tran D Le, Rana Arham Raashid, Linda Colpa, Jason Noble, Asim Ali, Agnes Wong

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatrics & child health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Feasibility of a school-based vision screening program to detect undiagnosed visual problems in kindergarten children in Ontario.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tran D LeDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
Rana Arham RaashidProgram in Neuroscience and Mental Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario.
Linda ColpaProgram in Neuroscience and Mental Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario.
Jason NobleDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
Asim AliDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
Agnes WongDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
Hospital for Sick Children · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesEarly intervention is critical to prevent treatable causes of vision loss in children. The objectives of the current study are: (1) to assess how well primary care physicians in Ontario follow the vision screening guidelines for children as recommended by the Canadian Paediatric Society and the Rourke Baby Record and (2) to identify barriers to vision screening in the primary care setting.

designCross-sectional survey.

methodsA 19-question survey was mailed out to 1000 randomly selected family physicians (family MDs), 1000 general practitioners (GPs) and 1000 paediatricians in Ontario as listed in the 2013 Canadian Medical Directory.

resultsA total of 719 completed surveys were included in the analysis (449 from family MDs/GPs and 270 from paediatricians). Vision screening was reported to be performed by 65% of family MDs/GPs and 52% of general paediatricians at every well child visit. While red reflex was reported to be checked by 94% of all physicians in children under 3, it was only performed by 25% of respondents for children over 3. Thirty seven percent of all physicians reported never performing a visual acuity test in any age group. When asked about the obstacles preventing them from performing vision screening, lack of training (family MDs/GPs: 50%, paediatricians: 42%), time constraints (family MDs/GPs: 42%; paediatricians: 40%) and inadequate reimbursement (family MDs/GPs: 17%; paediatricians: 15%) were the most commonly cited reasons.

conclusionsStrategies to improve vision screening are necessary given that early intervention is crucial to prevent treatable causes of vision loss in children.

Indexed as

AmblyopiaVision ScreeningVision Tests

Identifiers

PMID29769813
PMCPMC5951026
OpenAlexW2768681298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.