Go beyond bias training.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. To dismantle structural racism in science, scientists need to learn how it works.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
   Review
2. Ten simple rules for creating and sustaining antiracist graduate programs.PLoS computational biology · 2022
   Article
3. Postdocs as Key to Faculty Diversity: A Structured and Collaborative Approach for Research Universities.Frontiers in psychology · 2021
   Article
4. Unravelling the gender productivity gap in science: a meta-analytical review.Royal Society open science · 2019
   Article
5. Structure and belonging: Pathways to success for underrepresented minority and women PhD students in STEM fields.PloS one · 2019
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as