Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29769620›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Carvacrol and linalool co-loaded in β-cyclodextrin-grafted chitosan nanoparticles as sustainable biopesticide aiming pest control.

Estefânia V R Campos, Patrícia L F Proença, Jhones L Oliveira, Anderson E S Pereira, Lígia Nunes de Morais Ribeiro, Fabrício O Fernandes, Kelly C Gonçalves, Ricardo A Polanczyk, Tatiane Pasquoto-Stigliani, Renata Lima and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Co-encapsulation of omega-3 and vitamin DFrontiers in nutrition · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Fabrication ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Estefânia V R CamposSão Paulo State University - UNESP, Institute of Science and Technology, Sorocaba, SP, Brazil.
Patrícia L F ProençaSão Paulo State University - UNESP, Institute of Science and Technology, Sorocaba, SP, Brazil.
Jhones L OliveiraSão Paulo State University - UNESP, Institute of Science and Technology, Sorocaba, SP, Brazil.
Anderson E S PereiraSão Paulo State University - UNESP, Institute of Science and Technology, Sorocaba, SP, Brazil.
Lígia Nunes de Morais RibeiroDepartment of Biochemistry and Tissue Biology, State University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6097-5449
Fabrício O FernandesSão Paulo State University - UNESP, College of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, Department of Crop Protection, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Kelly C GonçalvesSão Paulo State University - UNESP, College of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, Department of Crop Protection, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Ricardo A PolanczykSão Paulo State University - UNESP, College of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, Department of Crop Protection, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Tatiane Pasquoto-StiglianiDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Sorocaba, Sorocaba, Brazil.
Renata LimaDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Sorocaba, Sorocaba, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8712-1144
Cirano C MelvilleSão Paulo State University - UNESP, College of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, Department of Crop Protection, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Jaqueline F Della VechiaSão Paulo State University - UNESP, College of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, Department of Crop Protection, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Daniel J AndradeSão Paulo State University - UNESP, College of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, Department of Crop Protection, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Leonardo F FracetoSão Paulo State University - UNESP, Institute of Science and Technology, Sorocaba, SP, Brazil. leonardo.fraceto@unesp.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pesticides are the main tactics for pest control because they reduce the pest population very fast and their efficiency does not depend on abiotic factors. However, the indiscriminate use of these substances can speed up the development of resistant populations and causing environmental contamination. Therefore, alternative methods of pest control are sought, such as the use of botanical compounds. Nanoencapsulation of volatile compounds has been shown to be an important tool that can be used to overcome the lack of stability of these compounds. In this work, we describe the preparation and characterization of chitosan nanoparticles functionalized with β-cyclodextrin containing carvacrol and linalool. The toxicity and biological activity were evaluated. Decreases of toxicity were observed when the compounds were nanoencapsulated. The nanoparticles presented insecticidal activity against the species Helicoverpa armigera (corn earworm) and Tetranychus urticae (spider mite). In addition, repellent activity and reduction in oviposition were observed for the mites.

Indexed as

Pest Control, BiologicalAcyclic MonoterpenesAnimalsbeta-CyclodextrinsBiological Control AgentsCell SurvivalChitosanCymenesInsecticidesMonoterpenesMothsNanoparticlesTetranychidaeAcyclic Monoterpenesbeta-CyclodextrinsBiological Control AgentscarvacrolChitosanchitosan-beta-cyclodextrinCymenesInsecticideslinaloolMonoterpenes

Identifiers

PMID29769620
PMCPMC5955913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.