Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29769366›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2018

Mate choice in the eye and ear of the beholder? Female multimodal sensory configuration influences her preferences.

Kelly L Ronald, Esteban Fernández-Juricic, Jeffrey R Lucas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Can you hear me? House sparrow auditory processing differs across an urbanization gradient.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Darwin, sexual selection, and the brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evolution and function of multimodal courtship displays.Ethology : formerly Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kelly L RonaldDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Jordan Hall, 1001 E 3rd Street, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA kelly.lennington@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3400-3018
Esteban Fernández-JuricicDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Jordan Hall, 1001 E 3rd Street, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
Jeffrey R LucasDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Jordan Hall, 1001 E 3rd Street, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9661-7985

Funding

Common Themes in Reproductive DiversityT32HD049336 · NICHD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI DALE R SENGELAUB · 2005 to 2026
$4.4M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD049336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A common assumption in sexual selection studies is that receivers decode signal information similarly. However, receivers may vary in how they rank signallers if signal perception varies with an individual's sensory configuration. Furthermore, receivers may vary in their weighting of different elements of multimodal signals based on their sensory configuration. This could lead to complex levels of selection on signalling traits. We tested whether multimodal sensory configuration could affect preferences for multimodal signals. We used brown-headed cowbird (

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionMating Preference, AnimalVisual PerceptionAnimal CommunicationAnimalsDecision MakingFemaleSongbirdsmultimodal sensory processingpreference functionssexual selection

Identifiers

PMID29769366
PMCPMC5966616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.