Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29769357›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2018

Evolution of genomic variation in the burrowing owl in response to recent colonization of urban areas.

Jakob C Mueller, Heiner Kuhl, Stefan Boerno, Jose L Tella, Martina Carrete, Bart Kempenaers

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Variant calling in nonmodel organisms with snpArcher.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jakob C MuellerDepartment of Behavioural Ecology & Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Seewiesen, Germany mueller@orn.mpg.de.ORCID 0000-0001-6676-7595
Heiner KuhlSequencing Core Facility, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany.
Stefan BoernoSequencing Core Facility, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany.
Jose L TellaDepartment of Conservation Biology, Estación Biológica de Doñana - CSIC, Sevilla, Spain.
Martina CarreteDepartment of Conservation Biology, Estación Biológica de Doñana - CSIC, Sevilla, Spain.
Bart KempenaersDepartment of Behavioural Ecology & Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Seewiesen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7505-5458
Estación Biológica de Doñana · ESMax Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics · DEMax Planck Institute for Ornithology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When a species successfully colonizes an urban habitat it can be expected that its population rapidly adapts to the new environment but also experiences demographic perturbations. It is, therefore, essential to gain an understanding of the population structure and the demographic history of the urban and neighbouring rural populations before studying adaptation at the genome level. Here, we investigate populations of the burrowing owl (

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenomeAnimal DistributionAnimalsArgentinaCitiesStrigiformescolonizationdemographypopulation genomicsStrigiformes

Identifiers

PMID29769357
PMCPMC5966595
OpenAlexW2803611067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.