Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29769302›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2018

Does the winner-loser effect determine male mating success?

Lauren M Harrison, Michael D Jennions, Megan L Head

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Does losing reduce the tendency to engage with rivals to reach mates? An experimental test.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
  7. Effects of past mating behavior versus past ejaculation on male mate choice and male attractiveness.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lauren M HarrisonEcology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia lauren.harrison@anu.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-6690-5035
Michael D JennionsEcology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Megan L HeadEcology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Winning or losing a fight can have lasting effects on competitors. Controlling for inherent fighting ability and other factors, a history of winning often makes individuals more likely to win future contests, while the opposite is true for losers (the 'winner-loser effect'). But does the winner-loser effect also influence a male's mating success? We experimentally staged contests between male mosquitofish (

Indexed as

AggressionAnimalsBody SizeCompetitive BehaviorCyprinodontiformesFemaleMaleSexual Behavior, AnimalcontestsGambusiamate choicemosquitofishsexual selection

Identifiers

PMID29769302
PMCPMC6012695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.