Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29769255›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2018

White matter hyperintensities and their subtypes in patients with carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Huirong Ye, Yujie Wang, Jianting Qiu, Qing Wu, Mengmeng Xu, Jian Wang

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The risk factors of old silent brain infarctions in carotid artery stenosis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Completeness of circle of Willis and white matter hyperintensities in patients with severe internal carotid artery stenosis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Huirong Ye *Department of Neurology, Cerebrovascular Disease Center, People's Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, People's Republic of China.
Yujie Wang *Department of Neurology, Cerebrovascular Disease Center, People's Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, People's Republic of China.
Jianting QiuDepartment of Neurology, Cerebrovascular Disease Center, People's Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, People's Republic of China.
Qing WuDepartment of Neurology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, People's Republic of China.
Mengmeng XuDepartment of Neurology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, People's Republic of China.
Jian WangDepartment of Neurology, Cerebrovascular Disease Center, People's Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the association between white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) and carotid artery (CA) stenosis. STUDY

designSystematic review and meta-analysis.

participantsCA stenosis was set at ≥50%, and WMHs were assessed by MRI and evaluated quantitatively or semiquantitatively. DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library for studies evaluating the association between WMHs and CA stenosis ≥50% from inception to 13 September 2017. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Standardised mean difference (SMD) with 95% CI was used to evaluate the association between WMHs and CA stenosis. Results were presented in a forest plot with a fixed-effects model or random-effects model. We assessed the quality of included studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Funnel plots and Egger's and Begg's tests were conducted to assess publication bias. Sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the influence of each individual study.

resultsEight studies enrolling 677 patients were included. There was a positive relationship between the total WMHs and CA stenosis, with a pooled fixed-effects SMD of 0.326 (95% CI 0.194 to 0.459, p=0.000). Heterogeneity and publication bias were low among these studies. Subgroup analysis of three studies enrolling 225 patients showed an association between periventricular WMHs and CA stenosis, with a pooled fixed-effects SMD of 0.412 (95% CI 0.202 to 0.622, p=0.000).

conclusionThis meta-analysis showed that the total WMHs and periventricular WMHs were associated with CA stenosis. WMHs may be considered as an individual risk stratification score when choosing a proper plan for therapy of CA stenosis.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingCarotid StenosisHumansWhite Mattercarotid artery stenosismagnetic resonance imagingmeta-analysissystematic reviewwhite matter hyperintensities

Identifiers

PMID29769255
PMCPMC5961568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.