Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29769186›Full record

ArticleBMJ case reports2018

Use of CSF infusion studies to unblock occluded hydrocephalus ventricular shunt catheters: a preliminary report of two patients.

Eva Nabbanja, John Douglas Pickard, Afroditi Despina Lalou, Zofia Helena Czosnyka

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ case reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Value of computerized shunt infusion study in assessment of pediatric hydrocephalus shunt function-a two center cross-sectional study.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2020
    Article
  5. Pfeiffer type 2 syndrome: review with updates on its genetics and molecular biology.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2019
    Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eva NabbanjaClinical Neurosciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
John Douglas PickardClinical Neurosciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Afroditi Despina LalouUniversity of Cambridge, Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3768-8681
Zofia Helena CzosnykaUniversity of Cambridge, Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0001237Medical Research Council G0600986Medical Research Council G9439390
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two patients with ventriculoperitoneal shunts presented with symptoms of raised intracranial pressure indicative of possible shunt malfunction. During investigation, to eliminate this possibility, cerebral spinal fluid infusion studies were performed, which indicated proximal occlusion of the shunts in both cases. Retrograde flush of the ventricular catheter was performed during temporary compression of the siphon-control device, a manoeuvre which blocks distal flow. After the use of this technique, both patients' symptoms improved and they have remained symptom-free for over 2 years. This case report validates the role that infusion studies can play in clearing a blocked ventricular catheter shunt.

Indexed as

Catheter ObstructionAdultBrainFemaleHumansHydrocephalusIntracranial HypertensionIsotonic SolutionsMaleRinger's LactateTomography, X-Ray ComputedVentriculoperitoneal ShuntIsotonic SolutionsRinger's LactateHydrocephalusMedical-surgical NursingNeuroimagingPerioperative CareSpinal Cord

Identifiers

PMID29769186
PMCPMC5965807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.