Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29769170›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2018

Design and Rationale for a Parent-Led Intervention to Increase Fruit and Vegetable Intake in Young Childhood Cancer Survivors (Reboot): Protocol for a Pilot Study.

Lauren Touyz, Jennifer Cohen, Claire Wakefield, Allison Grech, Sarah Garnett, Paayal Gohil, Richard Cohn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren Touyz *Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9294-3070
Jennifer CohenBehavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7798-1113
Claire WakefieldBehavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7704-7067
Allison GrechBehavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4478-4372
Sarah GarnettInstitute of Endocrinology and Diabetes, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7552-0789
Paayal GohilBehavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8375-0629
Richard CohnBehavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, School of Women's and Chidlren's Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2400-1353
UNSW Sydney · AUChildren's Hospital at Westmead · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoor dietary habits are common among childhood cancer survivors, despite increasing their risk of cardio metabolic complications after cancer treatment. Here, we describe the design and rationale for a pilot telephone-based, parent-led intervention aimed at increasing fruit and vegetable intake in young cancer survivors (Reboot).

objectiveThis pilot study aims to assess the feasibility and acceptability of delivering evidence-based telephone support to parents of childhood cancer survivors. A secondary aim includes assessing the effect of Reboot on improving childhood cancer survivors' dietary quality by increasing child fruit and vegetable intake and variety and its contribution to overall nutrient intake.

methodsWe aim to recruit parents of 15 young cancer survivors aged 2 to 12 years who have completed cancer treatment less than five years ago. The intervention comprises of 4 weekly 45-minute telephone sessions led by a health professional and one booster session 6 weeks later. Sessions address the effects of cancer treatment on children's diets, recommended fruit and vegetable intake for children, and evidence-based strategies to promote the consumption of fruit and vegetables as well as to manage fussy eating.

resultsReboot is based on an existing, evidence-based parent nutrition intervention and modified for childhood cancer survivors following extensive collaboration with experts in the field. Primary outcomes of feasibility and acceptability will be measured by the number of participants who complete all five sessions, average session length (minutes), length between sessions (days) and parent Likert ratings of the usefulness and impact of the intervention collected after the booster session. Of the 15 participants we aim to recruit, 3 have completed the intervention, 1 declined to participate, 11 are actively completing the intervention and 2 participants are providing written consent. The remaining 3 participants will be recruited via telephone follow-up calls. The intervention is due to be completed by July 2018.

conclusionsReboot aims to support healthy dietary behaviors in childhood cancer survivors who are at increased risk of developing serious cardiometabolic complications after their cancer treatment. Results will inform the development and implementation of future evidence-based dietary interventions delivered to childhood cancer survivors, particularly those living in rural and remote areas. REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER: RR1-10.2196/9252.

Indexed as

child, dietchildhood cancer survivorfeeding patternsfruitvegetables

Identifiers

PMID29769170
PMCPMC5976864
OpenAlexW2803664880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.