ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2018
Finite element analysis of the tibial bone graft in cementless total knee arthroplasty.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Effects of elastic modulus of the metal block on the condylar-constrained knee prosthesis tibial fixation stability].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025Article
- Model Properties and Clinical Application in the Finite Element Analysis of Knee Joint: A Review.Orthopaedic surgery · 2024Review
- Finite-element analysis of the proximal tibial sclerotic bone and different alignment in total knee arthroplasty.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAchieving stability of the tibial implant is essential following cementless total knee arthroplasty with bone grafting. We investigated the effects of bone grafting on the relative micromotion of the tibial implant and stress between the tibial implant and adjacent bone in the immediate postoperative period.
methodsTibial implant models were developed using a nonlinear, three-dimensional, finite element method. On the basis of a preprepared template, several bone graft models of varying sizes and material properties were prepared.
resultsMicromotion was larger in the bone graft models than in the intact model. Maximum micromotion and excessive stress in the area adjacent to the bone graft were observed for the soft and large graft models. With hard bone grafting, increased load transfer and decreased micromotion were observed.
conclusionsAvoidance of large soft bone grafts and use of hard bone grafting effectively reduced micromotion and undue stress in the adjacent area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.